“Crosstalk” technique: A comparison between two generations of cryoballoon catheter
Introduction The “Crosstalk” technique: if pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) of the superior one is not achieved due to a gap in the inferior part, it could be done during inferior vein cryoablation. This maneuver minimizes the total energy delivery time and number of lesions. We aimed to correlate the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2018-06, Vol.41 (6), p.635-642 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
The “Crosstalk” technique: if pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) of the superior one is not achieved due to a gap in the inferior part, it could be done during inferior vein cryoablation. This maneuver minimizes the total energy delivery time and number of lesions. We aimed to correlate the likelihood of crosstalk phenomenon with certain anatomic characteristics.
Methods
A total of 676 patients undergoing a first ablation procedure for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (470 first‐generation cryoballoon [CB] and 206 second‐generation CB) between June 2014 and December 2016 were included.
Results
“Crosstalk” phenomenon occurred in 32 patients (18 first‐generation CB, 14 second‐generation CB). Compared to 54 control patients without crosstalk, the angle between left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) and left atrial (LA) roof‐plane, left pulmonary common ostia were significant parameters associated with crosstalk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20, ±95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11–1.31, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0147-8389 1540-8159 |
DOI: | 10.1111/pace.13336 |