Establishing Representative No-Take Areas in the Great Barrier Reef: Large-Scale Implementation of Theory on Marine Protected Areas

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, an area almost the size of Japan, has a new network of no-take areas that significantly improves the protection of biodiversity. The new marine park zoning implements, in a quantitative manner, many of the theoretical design principles discussed in the literature....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology 2005-12, Vol.19 (6), p.1733-1744
Hauptverfasser: FERNANDES, LEANNE, DAY, JON, LEWIS, ADAM, SLEGERS, SUZANNE, KERRIGAN, BRIGID, BREEN, DAN, CAMERON, DARREN, JAGO, BELINDA, HALL, JAMES, LOWE, DAVE, INNES, JAMES, TANZER, JOHN, CHADWICK, VIRGINIA, THOMPSON, LEANNE, GORMAN, KERRIE, SIMMONS, MARK, BARNETT, BRYONY, SAMPSON, KIRSTI, DE'ATH, GLENN, MAPSTONE, BRUCE, MARSH, HELENE, POSSINGHAM, HUGH, BALL, IAN, WARD, TREVOR, DOBBS, KIRSTIN, AUMEND, JAMES, SLATER, DEB, STAPLETON, KATE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, an area almost the size of Japan, has a new network of no-take areas that significantly improves the protection of biodiversity. The new marine park zoning implements, in a quantitative manner, many of the theoretical design principles discussed in the literature. For example, the new network of no-take areas has at least 20% protection per "bioregion," minimum levels of protection for all known habitats and special or unique features, and minimum sizes for no-take areas of at least 10 or 20 km across at the smallest diameter. Overall, more than 33% of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park is now in no-take areas (previously 4.5%). The steps taken leading to this outcome were to clarify to the interested public why the existing level of protection was inadequate; detail the conservation objectives of establishing new no-take areas; work with relevant and independent experts to define, and contribute to, the best scientific process to deliver on the objectives; describe the biodiversity (e.g., map bioregions); define operational principles needed to achieve the objectives; invite community input on all of the above; gather and layer the data gathered in round-table discussions; report the degree of achievement of principles for various options of no-take areas; and determine how to address negative impacts. Some of the key success factors in this case have global relevance and include focusing initial communication on the problem to be addressed; applying the precautionary principle; using independent experts; facilitating input to decision making; conducting extensive and participatory consultation; having an existing marine park that encompassed much of the ecosystem; having legislative power under federal law; developing high-level support; ensuring agency priority and ownership; and being able to address the issue of displaced fishers.
ISSN:0888-8892
1523-1739
DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00302.x