Rural-Urban Disparity in Emergency Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction in Japan

Background:There are few reports examining regional differences between rural prefectures and metropolitan areas in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Japan.Methods and Results:In the Rural AMI registry, a prospective, multi-prefectural registry of AMI in 4 rural prefectures (Ish...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation Journal 2018/05/25, Vol.82(6), pp.1666-1674
Hauptverfasser: Masuda, Jun, Kishi, Mikio, Kumagai, Naoto, Yamazaki, Toru, Sakata, Kenji, Higuma, Takumi, Ogimoto, Akiyoshi, Dohi, Kaoru, Tanigawa, Takashi, Hanada, Hiroyuki, Nakamura, Mashio, Sokejima, Shigeru, Takayama, Morimasa, Higaki, Jitsuo, Yamagishi, Masakazu, Okumura, Ken, Ito, Masaaki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background:There are few reports examining regional differences between rural prefectures and metropolitan areas in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Japan.Methods and Results:In the Rural AMI registry, a prospective, multi-prefectural registry of AMI in 4 rural prefectures (Ishikawa, Aomori, Ehime and Mie), a total of 1,695 consecutive AMI patients were registered in 2013. Among them, 1,313 patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 24 h of onset were enrolled in this study (Rural group), and compared with the cohort data from the Tokyo CCU Network registry for AMI in the same period (Metropolitan group, 2,075 patients). The prevalence of direct ambulance transport to PCI-capable facilities in the Rural group was significantly lower than that in the Metropolitan group (43.8% vs. 60.3%, P
ISSN:1346-9843
1347-4820
1347-4820
DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1275