Effect of Age, Gender, and Sun Exposure on Ethnic Skin Photoaging: Evidence Gathered Using a New Photonumeric Scale

Abstract Background African–Americans are less affected by photoaging than lighter skin individuals. Although scales for photoaging have been developed for Caucasians and Asians, no scale exists for African–Americans. Aim To develop a photonumeric scale for photoaging and to determine factors that c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the National Medical Association 2018-04, Vol.110 (2), p.176-181
Hauptverfasser: Chien, Anna L., M.D, Qi, Ji, B.A, Grandhi, Radhika, B.A, Kim, Noori, M.D, César, Sabrina Sisto Alessi, M.D, Harris-Tryon, Tamia, M.D., Ph.D, Jang, Min Soo, M.D, Olowoyeye, Omolara, M.D, Kuhn, Diane, Ph.D, Leung, Sherry, B.A, Rainer, Barbara M., M.D, Poon, Flora, M.D, Suh, Jean, M.D, Cheng, Nancy, M.D, Okoye, Ginette A., M.D, Kang, Sewon, M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background African–Americans are less affected by photoaging than lighter skin individuals. Although scales for photoaging have been developed for Caucasians and Asians, no scale exists for African–Americans. Aim To develop a photonumeric scale for photoaging and to determine factors that contribute to photoaging in African–Americans. Methods Five participants' photographs were selected as standards to create a 9-point photonumeric scale (0 = none, 8 = most severe). Three blinded dermatologists used the scale to grade the remaining participants' photographs. Results Interrater reliabilities were 0.775 (95% CI: 0.635, 0.880) for trial 1 and 0.832 (0.747, 0.883) for trial 2. Intrarater reliabilities, assessed over a 1 week interval, were 0.863 (0.727, 0.940), 0.928 (0.890, 0.954), and 0.866 (0.739, 0.935) for the three graders, indicating strong agreement. Photoaging scores were then correlated with participants' survey on lifestyle factors, which yielded age as a significant predictor (r = 0.91, p 
ISSN:0027-9684
1943-4693
DOI:10.1016/j.jnma.2017.05.001