The Incidence and Impact of Secondary Cerebral Insults on Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Secondary cerebral insults can adversely affect patients with traumatic brain injury. By contrast, the incidence of secondary cerebral insults after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and their impact on outcome have been less well studied. Four hundred and twenty-one patients with SAH who und...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World neurosurgery 2018-06, Vol.114, p.e483-e494 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Secondary cerebral insults can adversely affect patients with traumatic brain injury. By contrast, the incidence of secondary cerebral insults after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and their impact on outcome have been less well studied.
Four hundred and twenty-one patients with SAH who underwent surgical occlusion of their ruptured aneurysm and who received intensive care unit care for ≥48 hours were retrospectively identified from a prospective observational database. Patients were managed according to standard recommendations for SAH. Three secondary cerebral insults were examined: hypotension (20 mm Hg), rebleed, intraoperative rupture, and hydrocephalus, secondary cerebral insults were independently associated with poor outcome (adjusted OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.20–5.02; P = 0.014).
Secondary cerebral insults (hypoxia, hypotension, and hyperglycemia) are common after SAH, including among patients with a good clinical grade. These insults after SAH are associated with worse outcome. These data suggest that prevention of secondary cerebral insults may provide an opportunity to improve patient outcome after SAH.
•Secondary cerebral insults are common after aneurysmal SAH.•Multiple secondary cerebral insults are more likely in poor-grade patients.•Secondary cerebral insults are associated with unfavorable outcome in both good-grade and poor-grade patients.•The adverse effect of these insults seems to be greater in patients who are admitted in good clinical grade. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1878-8750 1878-8769 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.195 |