Reduction of Irradiation Volume and Toxicities with 3-D Radiotherapy Planning over Conventional Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Treated with Long-term Hormonal Therapy

Background: As hormonal therapy has an influence not only on outcome but also on toxicities, we compare the efficacy of three-dimensional radiotherapy planning (3D-RTP) and of conventional radiotherapy (Conv-RT) in association with long-term hormonal therapy in reducing toxicity of treatment. Patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anticancer research 2008-11, Vol.28 (6B), p.3913-3920
Hauptverfasser: YAMAZAKI, Hideya, NISHIYAMA, Kinji, TANAKA, Eiichi, MAEDA, Osamu, MEGURO, Norio, KINOUCHI, Toshiaki, USAMI, Michiyuki, KAKIMOTO, Kenichi, ONO, Yutaka, NISHIMURA, Tsunehiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: As hormonal therapy has an influence not only on outcome but also on toxicities, we compare the efficacy of three-dimensional radiotherapy planning (3D-RTP) and of conventional radiotherapy (Conv-RT) in association with long-term hormonal therapy in reducing toxicity of treatment. Patients and Methods: A retrospective case-control study was performed comparing the frequency of radiation toxicity between 63 Conv-RT and 52 3D-RTP patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (intermediate to high risk) treated with combined hormonal therapy. The average duration of neoadjuvant treatment was 7 months (1-38 months) and that of adjuvant treatment was 38 months (4-94 months). Patients were treated with 70 Gy of box field radiotherapy for the same clinical target volume (60 Gy prostate + seminal vesicle and 10 Gy boost to prostate). Results: Treatment volumes (=X RL ×Y SI ×X AP , where X RL =right left length of anterior-posterior portals, X AP =anterior posterior length of lateral portals and Y SI =superior inferior length of anterior-posterior portals) were significantly smaller in the 3D-RTP group (630±130 cm 3 ) than in the Conv-RT group (1036±223 cm 3 ) (p
ISSN:0250-7005
1791-7530