Automated estimation of image quality for coronary computed tomographic angiography using machine learning

Objectives Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of a fully automated method for assessing the image quality (IQ) of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Methods The machine learning method was trained using 75 CCTA studies by mapping features (noise, contrast, misregistration scores, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2018-09, Vol.28 (9), p.4018-4026
Hauptverfasser: Nakanishi, Rine, Sankaran, Sethuraman, Grady, Leo, Malpeso, Jenifer, Yousfi, Razik, Osawa, Kazuhiro, Ceponiene, Indre, Nazarat, Negin, Rahmani, Sina, Kissel, Kendall, Jayawardena, Eranthi, Dailing, Christopher, Zarins, Christopher, Koo, Bon-Kwon, Min, James K., Taylor, Charles A., Budoff, Matthew J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of a fully automated method for assessing the image quality (IQ) of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Methods The machine learning method was trained using 75 CCTA studies by mapping features (noise, contrast, misregistration scores, and un-interpretability index) to an IQ score based on manual ground truth data. The automated method was validated on a set of 50 CCTA studies and subsequently tested on a new set of 172 CCTA studies against visual IQ scores on a 5-point Likert scale. Results The area under the curve in the validation set was 0.96. In the 172 CCTA studies, our method yielded a Cohen’s kappa statistic for the agreement between automated and visual IQ assessment of 0.67 ( p < 0.01). In the group where good to excellent ( n = 163), fair ( n = 6), and poor visual IQ scores ( n = 3) were graded, 155, 5, and 2 of the patients received an automated IQ score > 50 %, respectively. Conclusion Fully automated assessment of the IQ of CCTA data sets by machine learning was reproducible and provided similar results compared with visual analysis within the limits of inter-operator variability. Key points • The proposed method enables automated and reproducible image quality assessment. • Machine learning and visual assessments yielded comparable estimates of image quality. • Automated assessment potentially allows for more standardised image quality. • Image quality assessment enables standardization of clinical trial results across different datasets.
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-018-5348-8