Once-weekly versus every-other-day stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer (PATRIOT): A phase 2 randomized trial

Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regimens differ in time, dose, and fractionation. We completed a multicentre, randomized phase II study to investigate the impact of overall treatment time on quality of life (QOL). Men with low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer were randomly assign...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiotherapy and oncology 2018-05, Vol.127 (2), p.206-212
Hauptverfasser: Quon, Harvey C., Ong, Aldrich, Cheung, Patrick, Chu, William, Chung, Hans T., Vesprini, Danny, Chowdhury, Amit, Panjwani, Dilip, Pang, Geordi, Korol, Renee, Davidson, Melanie, Ravi, Ananth, McCurdy, Boyd, Zhang, Liying, Mamedov, Alexandre, Deabreu, Andrea, Loblaw, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regimens differ in time, dose, and fractionation. We completed a multicentre, randomized phase II study to investigate the impact of overall treatment time on quality of life (QOL). Men with low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer were randomly assigned to 40 Gy in 5 fractions delivered once per week (QW) vs. every other day (EOD). QOL was assessed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite. The primary endpoint was the proportion with a minimum clinically important change (MCIC) in bowel QOL during the acute (≤12 week) period, and analysis was by intention-to-treat. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01423474. 152 men from 3 centres were randomized with median follow-up of 47 months. Patients treated QW had superior acute bowel QOL with 47/69 (68%) reporting a MCIC compared to 63/70 (90%) treated EOD (p = 0.002). Fewer patients treated QW reported moderate–severe problems with bowel QOL during the acute period compared with EOD (14/70 [20%] vs. 40/70 [57%], p 
ISSN:0167-8140
1879-0887
DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2018.02.029