Hydrous ferric oxide precipitation in the presence of nonmetabolizing bacteria: Constraints on the mechanism of a biotic effect

We have used room temperature and cryogenic 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction (pXRD), mineral magnetometry, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), to study the synthetic precipitation of hydrous ferric oxides (HFOs) prepared either in the absence (abiotic, a-HFO) or presence...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geochimica et cosmochimica acta 2005-02, Vol.69 (3), p.553-577
Hauptverfasser: Rancourt, Denis G., Thibault, Pierre-Jean, Mavrocordatos, Denis, Lamarche, Gilles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We have used room temperature and cryogenic 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction (pXRD), mineral magnetometry, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), to study the synthetic precipitation of hydrous ferric oxides (HFOs) prepared either in the absence (abiotic, a-HFO) or presence (biotic, b-HFO) of nonmetabolizing bacterial cells ( Bacillus subtilis or Bacillus licheniformis, ∼10 8 cells/mL) and under otherwise identical chemical conditions, starting from Fe(II) (10 −2, 10 −3, or 10 −4 mol/L) under open oxic conditions and at different pH (6–9). We have also performed the first Mössbauer spectroscopy measurements of bacterial cell wall ( Bacillus subtilis) surface complexed Fe, where Fe(III) (10 −3.5–10 −4.5 mol/L) was added to a fixed concentration of cells (∼10 8 cells/mL) under open oxic conditions and at various pH (2.5–4.3). We find that non-metabolic bacterial cell wall surface complexation of Fe is not passive in that it affects Fe speciation in at least two ways: (1) it can reduce Fe(III) to sorbed-Fe 2+ by a proposed steric and charge transfer effect and (2) it stabilizes Fe(II) as sorbed-Fe 2+ against ambient oxidation. The cell wall sorption of Fe occurs in a manner that is not compatible with incorporation into the HFO structure (different coordination environment and stabilization of the ferrous state) and the cell wall-sorbed Fe is not chemically bonded to the HFO particle when they coexist (the sorbed Fe is not magnetically polarized by the HFO particle in its magnetically ordered state). This invalidates the concept that sorption is the first step in a heterogeneous nucleation of HFO onto bacterial cell walls. Both the a-HFOs and the b-HFOs are predominantly varieties of ferrihydrite (Fh), often containing admixtures of nanophase lepidocrocite (nLp), yet they show significant abiotic/biotic differences: Biotic Fh has less intraparticle (including surface region) atomic order (Mössbauer quadrupole splitting), smaller primary particle size (magnetometry blocking temperature), weaker Fe to particle bond strength (Mössbauer center shift), and no six-line Fh (6L-Fh) admixture (pXRD, magnetometry). Contrary to current belief, we find that 6L-Fh appears to be precipitated directly, under a-HFO conditions, from either Fe(II) or Fe(III), and depending on Fe concentration and pH, whereas the presence of bacteria disables all such 6L-Fh precipitation and produces two-line Fh (2L-Fh)-like biotic coprecipitates. Given the nature of t
ISSN:0016-7037
1872-9533
DOI:10.1016/j.gca.2004.07.018