Comparison of student self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing in nursing simulation: A quasi-experimental study
Student self-debriefing promotes self-confidence, helps to increase clinical performance, and is a more cost-effective method than is traditional instructor-led debriefing in simulation-based learning. This study compared the effectiveness of debriefing—in terms of the problem-solving process, team...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nurse education today 2018-06, Vol.65, p.67-73 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Student self-debriefing promotes self-confidence, helps to increase clinical performance, and is a more cost-effective method than is traditional instructor-led debriefing in simulation-based learning.
This study compared the effectiveness of debriefing—in terms of the problem-solving process, team effectiveness, debriefing assessment, and debriefing satisfaction—between an experimental group who received both student self-debriefing (SSD) and instructor debriefing (ID) and a control group who received only instructor debriefing.
This quasi-experimental study used a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design.
Two universities in South Korea.
A convenience sample of 123 senior nursing students. The data were collected between 15 April and 9 June 2016.
Differences in the problem-solving process, team effectiveness, debriefing assessment, and debriefing satisfaction between the SSD + ID group and the ID-only group were measured.
The SSD + ID group showed significant improvements in the problem-solving process (t = 4.32, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0260-6917 1532-2793 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.030 |