Comparison of student self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing in nursing simulation: A quasi-experimental study

Student self-debriefing promotes self-confidence, helps to increase clinical performance, and is a more cost-effective method than is traditional instructor-led debriefing in simulation-based learning. This study compared the effectiveness of debriefing—in terms of the problem-solving process, team...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nurse education today 2018-06, Vol.65, p.67-73
Hauptverfasser: Kang, Kyungja, Yu, Mi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Student self-debriefing promotes self-confidence, helps to increase clinical performance, and is a more cost-effective method than is traditional instructor-led debriefing in simulation-based learning. This study compared the effectiveness of debriefing—in terms of the problem-solving process, team effectiveness, debriefing assessment, and debriefing satisfaction—between an experimental group who received both student self-debriefing (SSD) and instructor debriefing (ID) and a control group who received only instructor debriefing. This quasi-experimental study used a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. Two universities in South Korea. A convenience sample of 123 senior nursing students. The data were collected between 15 April and 9 June 2016. Differences in the problem-solving process, team effectiveness, debriefing assessment, and debriefing satisfaction between the SSD + ID group and the ID-only group were measured. The SSD + ID group showed significant improvements in the problem-solving process (t = 4.32, p 
ISSN:0260-6917
1532-2793
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.030