Improved Safety and Efficacy of Small‐Bore Feeding Tube Confirmation Using an Electromagnetic Placement Device

Background Early enteral nutrition has been shown to decrease complications and improve patient outcomes. Post pyloric feeding is recommended for patients with gastric intolerance or at high risk for aspiration. Feeding tube placement can be challenging and pose risk of pulmonary complications. Reli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrition in clinical practice 2018-04, Vol.33 (2), p.268-273
Hauptverfasser: Powers, Jan, Luebbehusen, Michael, Aguirre, Lillian, Cluff, Julia, David, Mary Ann, Holly, Vince, Linford, Lorraine, Park, Nancy, Brunelle, Rocco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Early enteral nutrition has been shown to decrease complications and improve patient outcomes. Post pyloric feeding is recommended for patients with gastric intolerance or at high risk for aspiration. Feeding tube placement can be challenging and pose risk of pulmonary complications. Reliance on radiographic confirmation for feeding tube placement exposes the patient to radiation. Electromagnetic placement device (EMPD) may offer a method to minimize pulmonary complications, increase successful placement, and decrease radiation exposure to the patient. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using EMPD verification, instead of routine abdominal radiographic confirmation, for small‐bore feeding tube placement. Results Variables evaluated were adverse events, utilization of radiographs for confirmation, and success rate of feeding tube placement in the ordered location. Two time frames were reviewed. In a 1‐year period, 3754 small‐bore feeding tubes were placed using EMPD, with zero adverse events noted. Radiographic confirmation was utilized in 0%–29.2% of the EMPD placed tubes. Successful placement of feeding tubes using EMPD ranged from 94%–99.6%. During a 5‐year period, 7081 EMPD feeding tubes were evaluated. One adverse event, pneumothorax, occurred during the placement of these 7081 tubes, for a rate of 0.014%. Conclusion Feeding tube placement confirmation is safe and efficacious via EMPD providing an effective method of feeding tube placement with a success rate >94% into the desired location. EMPD is an accurate verification method of distal tip location, eliminating the need for routine abdominal radiographic confirmation.
ISSN:0884-5336
1941-2452
DOI:10.1002/ncp.10062