Use and representations of intrauterine device in Martinique, F.W.I.: A cross-sectional survey

Abortion rate is higher in Martinique than in metropolitan France. Difference in pattern of contraception may be involved, particularly regarding IUD use. IUD use is often hampered by misconceptions. The aim of the study was to evaluate IUD use in a non-selected population in Martinique and to explore knowledge and acceptance of the method. Women were submitted a self-questionnaire about their contraceptive history, appropriate candidates for, effectiveness, side effects and perceived risks of IUD. Acceptance of the method among men and women and reasons for rejecting it were also surveyed. We included 112 men and 136 women. Descriptive statistics and comparison of answers between ever and never IUD-users were realized. Past or current IUD use was found in 26.5% [19.3-34.8] of women and the method was known by 90.4% of women and 85.1% of men. Pain at insertion (important for 22%), infectious risk (increased for 23.6%), and eligible candidates for the method (possible in nulliparous for only 56.9%) were the main misconceptions recorded. Knowledge was better among ever than never IUD-users. Theoretical acceptance of the method was high (87.5% among women of reproductive age, 82.5% among men). Rejection of the method was mainly motivated by doubts on efficacy and fear from pain, whereas religious barriers were seldom set forward. IUD use seems comparable in Martinique and France but misconceptions are still common. Information may help diffusion of IUD in a targeted population at higher risk of unintended pregnancy.