Exploring Treatment Fidelity in Persons With Aphasia Autonomously Practicing With Computerized Therapy Materials

Current computer technologies permit independent practice for people with cognitive-communicative disorders. Previous research has investigated compliance rates and outcome changes but not treatment fidelity per se during practice. Our aim was to examine adherence to procedures (treatment fidelity)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of speech-language pathology 2018-03, Vol.27 (1S), p.454-463
Hauptverfasser: Ball, Angel L, de Riesthal, Michael, Steele, Richard D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Current computer technologies permit independent practice for people with cognitive-communicative disorders. Previous research has investigated compliance rates and outcome changes but not treatment fidelity per se during practice. Our aim was to examine adherence to procedures (treatment fidelity) and accuracy while persons with aphasia independently practiced word production using interactive, multimodal, user-controlled, word-level icons on computers. Four persons with aphasia independently practiced single-word production after stimulation via user-initiated interactions in 3 conditions: (I) auditory stimulus with static representational drawing; (II) auditory stimulus with synchronized articulation video; and (III) users' choice between the 2 prior conditions. Sessions were video-recorded for subsequent analysis, which established emergently refined behavioral taxonomies using an iterative, mixed-methods approach. In independent practice, users only sometimes adhere to modeled behaviors, other times improvising novel behaviors. The latter sometimes co-occurred with successful productions. Differences in success rates were noted between Conditions I and II across behaviors with Condition II generally favored. In Condition III, participants tended to choose the stimulus that resulted in highest success rates. During independent practice with technology, persons with aphasia do not necessarily comply with clinicians' practice instructions, and treatment fidelity does not determine success. Autonomy and choice in practice may reveal unanticipated dimensions for computerized aphasia treatment.
ISSN:1058-0360
1558-9110
DOI:10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0204