Ultra-early response assessment in lymphoma treatment: [18F]FDG PET/MR captures changes in glucose metabolism and cell density within the first 72 hours of treatment
Purpose To determine whether, in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), [ 18 F]FDG PET/MR can capture treatment effects within the first week after treatment initiation, and whether changes in glucose metabolism and cell density occur simultaneously. Methods Patients with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2018-06, Vol.45 (6), p.931-940 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To determine whether, in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), [
18
F]FDG PET/MR can capture treatment effects within the first week after treatment initiation, and whether changes in glucose metabolism and cell density occur simultaneously.
Methods
Patients with histologically proven HL or NHL were included in this prospective IRB-approved study. Patients underwent [
18
F]FDG PET/MR before, and then 48–72 h after (follow-up 1, FU-1) and 1 week after (FU-2) initiation of the first cycle of their respective standard chemotherapy (for HL) or immunochemotherapy (for NHL). Standardized [
18
F]FDG uptake values (SUVmax, SUVmean) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCmin, ADCmean) based on diffusion-weighted MRI, and metabolic and morphological tumour volumes (MTV, VOL) were assessed at each time-point. Multilevel analyses with an unstructured covariance matrix, and pair-wise post-hoc tests were used to test for significant changes in SUVs, ADCs, MTVs and VOLs between the three time-points.
Results
A total of 58 patients (11 with HL and 47 with NHL) with 166 lesions were analysed. Lesion-based mean rates of change in SUVmax, SUVmean, ADCmin, ADCmean, MTV and VOL between baseline and FU-1 were −46.8%, −33.3%, +20.3%, +14%, −46% and −12.8%, respectively, and between baseline and FU-2 were −65.1%, −49%, +50.7%, +32.4%, −61.1% and −24.2%, respectively. These changes were statistically significant (
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1619-7070 1619-7089 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00259-018-3937-z |