Structural and practical identifiability analysis of outbreak models

•Structural analysis is performed on prevalence and cumulative incidence data structures to classical epidemic models.•Practical identifiability is performed on the same models using Monte Carlo simulations and Fisher’s Information Matrix.•SIR is structurally identifiable but not practically identifiable to cumulative incidence observations.•None of these models are practically identifiable from cumulative incidence data, standard data type provided by CDC or WHO.•SEIR model is practically unidentifiable from the data of Ebola’s cumulative incidence in Liberia. Estimating the reproduction number of an emerging infectious disease from an epidemiological data is becoming more essential in evaluating the current status of an outbreak. However, these studies are lacking the fundamental prerequisite in parameter estimation problem, namely the structural identifiability of the epidemic model, which determines the possibility of uniquely determining the model parameters from the epidemic data. In this paper, we perform both structural and practical identifiability analysis to classical epidemic models such as SIR (Susceptible-Infected-Recovered), SEIR (Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered) and an epidemic model with the treatment class (SITR). We performed structural identifiability analysis on these epidemic models using a differential algebra approach to investigate the well-posedness of the parameter estimation problem. Parameters of these models are estimated from different data types, namely prevalence, cumulative incidences and treated individuals. Furthermore, we carried out practical identifiability analysis on these models using Monte Carlo simulations and Fisher’s Information Matrix. Our study shows that the SIR model is both structurally and practically identifiable from the prevalence data. It is also structurally identifiable to cumulative incidence observations, but due to high correlations of the parameters, it is practically unidentifiable from the cumulative incidence data. Furthermore, we found that none of these simple epidemic models are practically identifiable from the cumulative incidence data which is the standard type of epidemiological data provided by CDC or WHO. Our analysis with simple SIR model suggest that the health agencies, if possible, should report prevalence rather than incidence data.