An Integrated Quantitative Index for Measuring Chronic Multisite Pain: The Multiple Areas of Pain (MAP) Study

Abstract Objective Despite the high prevalence of chronic multisite pain, there is little consensus on methods to characterize it. Commonly used assessments report only one dimension of pain, that is, intensity, thus ignoring the spatial aspect of pain. We developed a novel pain quantification index...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) Mass.), 2018-07, Vol.19 (7), p.1425-1435
Hauptverfasser: Wallace, Mark S, North, James, Grigsby, Eric J, Kapural, Leonardo, Sanapati, Mahendra R, Smith, Stephen G, Willoughby, Channing, McIntyre, Patrick J, Cohen, Steven P, Rosenthal, Richard M, Ahmed, Shaik, Vallejo, Ricardo, Ahadian, Farshad M, Yearwood, Thomas L, Burton, Allen W, Frankoski, Edward J, Shetake, Jai, Lin, Sherry, Hershey, Brad, Rogers, Benjamin, Mekel-Bobrov, Nitzan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective Despite the high prevalence of chronic multisite pain, there is little consensus on methods to characterize it. Commonly used assessments report only one dimension of pain, that is, intensity, thus ignoring the spatial aspect of pain. We developed a novel pain quantification index, the Integrated Pain Quantification Index (IPQI), on a scale of 0 to 1 that integrates multiple distinct pain measures into a single value, thus representing multidimensional pain information with a single value. Design Single-visit, noninterventional, epidemiological study. Setting Fourteen outpatient multidisciplinary pain management programs. Patients Patients with chronic pain of the trunk and/or limbs for at least six months with average overall pain intensity of at least 5 on the numeric rating scale. Methods Development of IPQI was performed in a large population (N = 810) of chronic pain patients from the Multiple Areas of Pain (MAP) study. Results Prevalence of two or more noncontiguous painful areas was at 88.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86–0.90), with a mean of 6.3 areas (SD = 5.57 areas). Prevalence of more than 10% body area in pain was at 52.8% (95% CI = 0.49–0.56), with a mean at 16.1% (17.16%). On average, IPQI values were near the middle of the scale, with mean and median IPQI at 0.52 (SD = 0.13) and 0.55, respectively. The IPQI was generalizable and clinically relevant across all domains recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials. Conclusions IPQI provided a single pain score for representing complex, multidimensional pain information on one scale and has implications for comparing pain populations across longitudinal clinical trials.
ISSN:1526-2375
1526-4637
DOI:10.1093/pm/pnx325