Diagnosing Distensible Venous Malformations of the Orbit With Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging

To compare the diffusion-weighted imaging of nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations of the orbit with that of other histologically-proven orbital tumors. Retrospective case-control study. Patients with nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations of the orbit and patients with other histol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2018-05, Vol.189, p.146-154
Hauptverfasser: Kalin-Hajdu, Evan, Colby, John B., Idowu, Oluwatobi, Grumbine, F. Lawson, Kang, Jessica M., Hirabayashi, Kristin S., Glastonbury, Christine M., Vagefi, M. Reza, Kersten, Robert C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare the diffusion-weighted imaging of nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations of the orbit with that of other histologically-proven orbital tumors. Retrospective case-control study. Patients with nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations of the orbit and patients with other histologically-proven orbital tumors were selected for chart review. The main outcome measure was the apparent diffusion coefficient of these lesions. Sixty-seven patients qualified for chart review; 9 patients had nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations and 58 patients had other histologically-proven tumors. Three of the 9 patients with nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations were initially misdiagnosed as having had solid orbital tumors. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient of distensible venous malformations was 2.80 ± 0.48 × 10−3 mm2/s, whereas the mean apparent diffusion coefficient of other histologically-proven tumors was 1.18 ± 0.39 × 10−3 mm2/s (P < .001). The mean apparent diffusion coefficient ranged from 2.42 to 3.94 × 10−3 mm2/s in the distensible venous malformation group, whereas other histologically-proven tumors ranged from 0.53 to 2.08 × 10−3 mm2/s. Therefore, in this single-institution series, a threshold value of 2.10 × 10−3 mm2/s was 100% sensitive and 100% specific for distensible venous malformations. Certain nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations can evade diagnostic suspicion and mimic solid orbital tumors on standard magnetic resonance imaging sequences. In this single-institution series, diffusion-weighted imaging effectively distinguished these nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations from other orbital tumors.
ISSN:0002-9394
1879-1891
DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.02.005