Hot Off the Press: Peripheral Intravenous Cannula Insertion and Use in the Emergency Department

This is a prospective before–after study comparing peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) placement and usage rates following a 10‐week‐long multimodal intervention provided to medical and nursing staff working in a tertiary emergency department (ED). The intervention focused on improving appropr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic emergency medicine 2018-06, Vol.25 (6), p.668-671
Hauptverfasser: Rangarajan, Sahaana, Morgenstern, Justin, Milne, William K., Heitz, Corey, Choo, Esther K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This is a prospective before–after study comparing peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) placement and usage rates following a 10‐week‐long multimodal intervention provided to medical and nursing staff working in a tertiary emergency department (ED). The intervention focused on improving appropriate use of PIVCs in an emergency setting by emphasizing to clinicians that a PIVC should only be placed if it was believed there was more than an 80% chance that it would be used. Patients were eligible for the study if they presented to the ED and were >18 years of age. Patients were excluded from the study if they were triage category 1, already had a PIVC placed in an ambulance, or were transferred from another hospital. Among the 4,172 patients included in the analysis, there was a 9.8% reduction in the number of PIVCs inserted (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.8–12.87) and a 12% increase in PIVC usage (95% CI = 8.7%–17.0%) in the postintervention cohort.
ISSN:1069-6563
1553-2712
DOI:10.1111/acem.13390