Hot Off the Press: Peripheral Intravenous Cannula Insertion and Use in the Emergency Department
This is a prospective before–after study comparing peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) placement and usage rates following a 10‐week‐long multimodal intervention provided to medical and nursing staff working in a tertiary emergency department (ED). The intervention focused on improving appropr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic emergency medicine 2018-06, Vol.25 (6), p.668-671 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This is a prospective before–after study comparing peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) placement and usage rates following a 10‐week‐long multimodal intervention provided to medical and nursing staff working in a tertiary emergency department (ED). The intervention focused on improving appropriate use of PIVCs in an emergency setting by emphasizing to clinicians that a PIVC should only be placed if it was believed there was more than an 80% chance that it would be used. Patients were eligible for the study if they presented to the ED and were >18 years of age. Patients were excluded from the study if they were triage category 1, already had a PIVC placed in an ambulance, or were transferred from another hospital. Among the 4,172 patients included in the analysis, there was a 9.8% reduction in the number of PIVCs inserted (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.8–12.87) and a 12% increase in PIVC usage (95% CI = 8.7%–17.0%) in the postintervention cohort. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1069-6563 1553-2712 |
DOI: | 10.1111/acem.13390 |