Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety profile

Purpose This study aims to comparatively evaluate clinical outcomes of mini-PCNL and FURS for treating urinary tract calculi in a single session. Methods A systematic search using electronic databases was performed for studies comparing mini-PCNL and FURS for the treatment of urinary tract calculi....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of urology 2018-07, Vol.36 (7), p.1127-1138
Hauptverfasser: Davis, N. F., Quinlan, M. R., Poyet, C., Lawrentschuk, N., Bolton, D. M., Webb, D., Jack, G. S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose This study aims to comparatively evaluate clinical outcomes of mini-PCNL and FURS for treating urinary tract calculi in a single session. Methods A systematic search using electronic databases was performed for studies comparing mini-PCNL and FURS for the treatment of urinary tract calculi. The primary outcome measurements were stone-free rates (SFRs) and complication rates for both techniques. Secondary outcome measurements were to compare patient demographics, operative duration, and inpatient stay. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager version 5.3 software. Results Sixteen studies on 1598 patients ( n  = 877 for mini-PCNL and n  = 721 for FURS) met inclusion criteria. Demographics including age ( p  = 0.26), body mass index (BMI) ( p  = 0.51), and gender ratio ( p  = 0.6), were similar in both groups. Overall, SFR was significantly greater in the mini-PCNL group compared to the FURS group ( n  = 763/877, 89.3 ± 8.4% versus n  = 559/721, 80.1 ± 13.3% [OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.53–2.64; p  
ISSN:0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2230-x