Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety profile
Purpose This study aims to comparatively evaluate clinical outcomes of mini-PCNL and FURS for treating urinary tract calculi in a single session. Methods A systematic search using electronic databases was performed for studies comparing mini-PCNL and FURS for the treatment of urinary tract calculi....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of urology 2018-07, Vol.36 (7), p.1127-1138 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
This study aims to comparatively evaluate clinical outcomes of mini-PCNL and FURS for treating urinary tract calculi in a single session.
Methods
A systematic search using electronic databases was performed for studies comparing mini-PCNL and FURS for the treatment of urinary tract calculi. The primary outcome measurements were stone-free rates (SFRs) and complication rates for both techniques. Secondary outcome measurements were to compare patient demographics, operative duration, and inpatient stay. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager version 5.3 software.
Results
Sixteen studies on 1598 patients (
n
= 877 for mini-PCNL and
n
= 721 for FURS) met inclusion criteria. Demographics including age (
p
= 0.26), body mass index (BMI) (
p
= 0.51), and gender ratio (
p
= 0.6), were similar in both groups. Overall, SFR was significantly greater in the mini-PCNL group compared to the FURS group (
n
= 763/877, 89.3 ± 8.4% versus
n
= 559/721, 80.1 ± 13.3% [OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.53–2.64;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0724-4983 1433-8726 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00345-018-2230-x |