Effectiveness of acellular pertussis vaccine and evolution of pertussis incidence in the community of Madrid from 1998 to 2015

•Vaccination effectiveness increases with the number of doses and decreases with time.•B. pertussis is circulating in our population despite high vaccine coverage.•Immunization threshold that interrupts disease transmission still unreached.•New vaccination strategies should be designed.•The Surveill...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2018-03, Vol.36 (12), p.1643-1649
Hauptverfasser: Latasa, P., García-Comas, L., Gil de Miguel, A., Barranco, M.D., Rodero, I., Sanz, J.C., Ordobás, M., Arce, A., Garrido-Estepa, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Vaccination effectiveness increases with the number of doses and decreases with time.•B. pertussis is circulating in our population despite high vaccine coverage.•Immunization threshold that interrupts disease transmission still unreached.•New vaccination strategies should be designed.•The Surveillance System should be adapted to the challenges B. pertussis poses. Pertussis is a communicable disease that primarily affects infants. Vaccination has led to an important reduction in the incidence of the disease, however, resurgence of the disease has been observed. This study aimed to analyze the incidence of pertussis and assess the vaccination effectiveness (VE) of different schedules of acellular pertussis vaccination in the community of Madrid. Pertussis cases notified to the Mandatory Disease Reporting System from 1998 to 2015 were analyzed. Five comparison periods were created: 1998–2001 (reference), 2002–2005, 2006–2009, 2010–2012 and 2013–2015. The incidence ratio (IR) between inter-epidemic periods was analyzed using a Poisson regression. VE was calculated using the screening method. Vaccine status data were collected from the vaccine registry. In total, 3855 cases were notified. Inter-epidemic periods were observed every 3–4 years. The incidence increased (IR: 5.99, p 
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.070