Component-resolved diagnosis in selecting patients for yellowjacket venom immunotherapy
Venom immunotherapy is effective in preventing systemic allergic reactions (SARs), but the diagnosis of venom allergy is problematic. To compare the performance of component-resolved diagnosis and conventional tests in patients referred for venom immunotherapy. We measured serum-specific immunoglobu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology asthma, & immunology, 2018-02, Vol.120 (2), p.184-189 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Venom immunotherapy is effective in preventing systemic allergic reactions (SARs), but the diagnosis of venom allergy is problematic.
To compare the performance of component-resolved diagnosis and conventional tests in patients referred for venom immunotherapy.
We measured serum-specific immunoglobulin E to yellowjacket and honeybee venoms (Ves v 1 and Ves v 5 and Api m 1), cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants, serum basal tryptase (ImmunoCAP, ThermoFisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden), and skin prick test reactions in 84 patients referred to receive venom immunotherapy. History of SAR and its severity were evaluated.
Of the 78 patients with suspected yellowjacket venom (YJV) allergy, a history of SAR was confirmed in 47 (60%) and 31 (40%) had a non-SAR reaction. The most accurate tests to confirm venom allergy after a SAR were serum-specific immunoglobulin E to yellowjacket whole-venom extract spiked with Ves v 5 (area under the curve 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.77–0.97, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1081-1206 1534-4436 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.anai.2017.11.012 |