Development of recombinase polymerase amplification assays for the rapid detection of peste des petits ruminants virus

•Conventional and real-time RT-RPA assays were developed for the detection of PPRV.•Both assays showed high sensitivity and specificity in PPRV detection.•Both assays are reliable diagnostic tools for the rapid detection of PPRV infection. Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is a severe infectious dise...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of virological methods 2018-04, Vol.254, p.35-39
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Yongning, Wang, Jianchang, Zhang, Zhou, Mei, Lin, Wang, Jinfeng, Wu, Shaoqiang, Lin, Xiangmei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Conventional and real-time RT-RPA assays were developed for the detection of PPRV.•Both assays showed high sensitivity and specificity in PPRV detection.•Both assays are reliable diagnostic tools for the rapid detection of PPRV infection. Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is a severe infectious disease of small ruminants caused by PPR virus (PPRV). Rapid and sensitive detection of PPRV is critical for controlling PPR. This report describes the development and evaluation of a conventional reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-RPA) assay and a real-time RT-RPA assay, targeting the PPRV N gene. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the conventional RT-RPA assay could detect 852 copies of standard PPRV RNA per reaction at 95% probability within 20 min at 41 °C, and the real-time RT-RPA assay could detect 103 copies of RNA molecules per reaction at 95% probability. Specificity analysis showed that both assays have no cross-reactivity with nucleic acid templates prepared from other selected viruses or common pathogens. Clinical evaluation using 162 ovine and hircine serum and nasal swab samples showed that the performance of both the real-time RT-RPA assay and the conventional RT-RPA assay were comparable to that of real-time RT-PCR. The overall agreements between real-time RT-PCR and real-time RT-RPA, and conventional RT-RPA were 99.4% (161/162) and 98.8% (160/162), respectively. The R2 value of real-time RT-RPA and real-time RT-PCR was 0.900 by linear regression analysis. Our results suggest that both RT-RPA assays have a potential application in the rapid, sensitive and specific detection of PPRV.
ISSN:0166-0934
1879-0984
DOI:10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.01.012