Herbivorous and microbial grazing pathways of metazooplankton in the Senegal River Estuary (West Africa)

The trophic relationships between metazooplankton and natural particles were studied in May 2002 in the Senegal River Estuary (16°N, 16°W) in low water conditions (dry season). Environmental factors, micro-organism and metazooplankton were analyzed through sampling at a fixed station. Gut fluorescen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Estuarine, coastal and shelf science coastal and shelf science, 2006-04, Vol.67 (3), p.369-381
Hauptverfasser: Pagano, Marc, Champalbert, Gisèle, Aka, Maryse, Kouassi, Ernest, Arfi, Robert, Got, Patrice, Troussellier, Marc, N'Dour, E.H., Corbin, Daniel, Bouvy, Marc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The trophic relationships between metazooplankton and natural particles were studied in May 2002 in the Senegal River Estuary (16°N, 16°W) in low water conditions (dry season). Environmental factors, micro-organism and metazooplankton were analyzed through sampling at a fixed station. Gut fluorescence measurements of and field experiments on zooplankton metabolism were also performed. Chlorophyll a concentrations ranged from 6.5 to 10.2 μg l −1. The phytoplankton was dominated by picoplanktonic cells (83–94% of total numbers). The particulate organic carbon (1.2–2.7 mg l −1) originated for a large amount from organic detritus (20–70%). The zooplankton biomass was dominated by Cirripedia larvae and calanoid copepods ( Acartia clausi, Temora stylifera and Paracalanus spp.). These taxa showed diel vertical migrations and maximal gut fluorescence at night, independently of tidal effects. Metabolic budgets show that their daily ingestion rates on phytoplankton (27–55% of body carbon weight) were insufficient to balance their respiration needs (40–51% of body carbon) and suggest that a selective feeding upon micro-heterotrophs (Heterotrophic NanoFlagellates, HNF) and/or detritus would be necessary to complete their energetic needs. The daily grazing pressure of metazooplankton represented only 5% of the in situ chlorophyll a and 14% of the primary production, but this pressure was mainly orientated towards nanophytoplankton. The daily recycling of nutrients by the metazooplankton excretion was rather high (83 and 46% of the in situ NH 4-N and PO 4-P concentrations, respectively). Therefore, the impact of metazooplankton on phytoplankton through top-down (grazing) and bottom-up (nutrient recycling) processes seemed substantial in this tropical estuary.
ISSN:0272-7714
1096-0015
DOI:10.1016/j.ecss.2005.10.018