Health-related quality of life and pelvic floor dysfunction in advanced-stage ovarian cancer survivors: associations with objective activity behaviors and physiological characteristics

Purpose Little is known about the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQoL), pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), and modifiable lifestyle and physiological factors for ovarian cancer survivors (OCS). The primary aim of the study was to compare post-treatment advanced-stage OCS with age...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2018-07, Vol.26 (7), p.2239-2246
Hauptverfasser: Schofield, Christelle, Newton, Robert U., Cohen, Paul A., Galvão, Daniel A., McVeigh, Joanne A., Mohan, Ganendra R., Tan, Jason, Salfinger, Stuart G., Straker, Leon M., Peddle-McIntyre, Carolyn J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Little is known about the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQoL), pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), and modifiable lifestyle and physiological factors for ovarian cancer survivors (OCS). The primary aim of the study was to compare post-treatment advanced-stage OCS with age-matched controls on measures of HRQoL and PFD. The secondary aim was to examine associations between HRQoL, PFD, objective activity behaviors, physical function, and body composition in OCS. Methods Twenty advanced-stage OCS and 20 controls completed questionnaires assessing HRQoL (SF-36) and PFD (Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire), and underwent objective assessments of activity behavior (7-day accelerometry), physical function (400-m walk, repeated chair rise, 6-m usual-pace walk, one-repetition maximum chest press, and single-leg extension), and body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry). Results Compared to controls, OCS had worse physical HRQoL (− 4.3 median difference, p  = 0.013), but equivalent self-reported PFD, indicated by combined bladder, bowel, and pelvic organ prolapse symptoms (0.89 mean difference, p  = 0.277). In OCS, physical HRQoL was significantly negatively associated with PFD ( r  = 0.468, p  = 0.043). Decreased physical HRQoL and increased PFD were significantly associated with less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in ≥ 10-min bouts ( ρ  = 0.627, p  = 0.003; ρ  = − 0.457, p  = 0.049), more sedentary time ( r  = − 0.449, p  = 0.047; r  = 0.479, p  = 0.038), and slower 400-m walk time ( ρ  = − 0.565, p  = 0.022; ρ  = 0.504, p  = 0.028). Conclusions Post-treatment advanced-stage OCS have decreased physical HRQoL, which is associated with modifiable factors such as worse PFD, less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, more sedentary time, and decreased objective physical function. This highlights the need for ongoing supportive care and multidisciplinary interventions after first-line ovarian cancer treatment.
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-018-4069-5