Usefulness of FC-TRIPLEX Chagas/Leish IgG1 as confirmatory assay for non-negative results in blood bank screening of Chagas disease

A relevant issue in Chagas disease serological diagnosis regards the requirement of using several confirmatory methods to elucidate the status of non-negative results from blood bank screening. The development of a single reliable method may potentially contribute to distinguish true and false posit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of immunological methods 2018-04, Vol.455, p.34-40
Hauptverfasser: Campos, Fernanda Magalhães Freire, Repoles, Laura Cotta, de Araújo, Fernanda Fortes, Peruhype-Magalhães, Vanessa, Xavier, Marcelo Antônio Pascoal, Sabino, Ester Cerdeira, de Freitas Carneiro Proietti, Anna Bárbara, Andrade, Mariléia Chaves, Teixeira-Carvalho, Andréa, Martins-Filho, Olindo Assis, Gontijo, Célia Maria Ferreira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A relevant issue in Chagas disease serological diagnosis regards the requirement of using several confirmatory methods to elucidate the status of non-negative results from blood bank screening. The development of a single reliable method may potentially contribute to distinguish true and false positive results. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of the multiplexed flow-cytometry anti-T. cruzi/Leishmania IgG1 serology/(FC-TRIPLEX Chagas/Leish IgG1) with three conventional confirmatory criteria (ELISA-EIA, Immunofluorescence assay-IIF and EIA/IIF consensus criterion) to define the final status of samples with actual/previous non-negative results during anti-T. cruzi ELISA-screening in blood banks. Apart from inconclusive results, the FC-TRIPLEX presented a weak agreement index with EIA, while a strong agreement was observed when either IIF or EIA/IIF consensus criteria were applied. Discriminant analysis and Spearman's correlation further corroborates the agreement scores. ROC curve analysis showed that FC-TRIPLEX performance indexes were higher when IIF and EIA/IIF consensus were used as a confirmatory criterion. Logistic regression analysis further demonstrated that the probability of FC-TRIPLEX to yield positive results was higher for inconclusive results from IIF and EIA/IIF consensus. Machine learning tools illustrated the high level of categorical agreement between FC-TRIPLEX versus IIF or EIA/IIF consensus. Together, these findings demonstrated the usefulness of FC-TRIPLEX as a tool to elucidate the status of non-negative results in blood bank screening of Chagas disease. •FC-TRIPLEX presented a strong agreement index with negative/positive IIF and EIA/IIF consensus criterion;•The probability of FC-TRIPLEX to yield positive results was higher for inconclusive results from IIF and EIA/IIF consensus;•Machine learning tools illustrated the high level of categorical agreement between FC-TRIPLEX versus IIF or EIA/IIF consensus;•FC-TRIPLEX is a single assay to elucidate the status of non-negative results from blood bank screening for Chagas disease.
ISSN:0022-1759
1872-7905
DOI:10.1016/j.jim.2018.01.006