Angioplasty vs stent in the treatment of transplant renal artery stenosis

Objective To compare outcomes between percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement in the treatment of transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS). Methods We retrospectively studied patients who underwent angiography for TRAS between 1/1/2008 and 9/20/2016 at 1 center. We compared the rate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical transplantation 2018-04, Vol.32 (4), p.e13217-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Ling‐Xin, De Mattos, Angelo, Bang, Heejung, Vu, Catherine T., Gandhi, Mehul, Alnimri, Muna, Gallay, Brian, Fananapazir, Ghaneh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To compare outcomes between percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement in the treatment of transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS). Methods We retrospectively studied patients who underwent angiography for TRAS between 1/1/2008 and 9/20/2016 at 1 center. We compared the rates of restenosis in patients who were treated with angioplasty alone vs those who were treated with stenting. Secondary outcomes included serum creatinine and blood pressure after intervention and graft and patient survival. Results A total of 82 patients were identified as having TRAS after angiography. Restenosis occurred in 28% (16 of 58) of the angioplasty patients compared with 8% (2 of 24) of the stented patients (P = .04). Repeat angiography occurred in 14% (8 of 58) of angioplasty patients vs 13% (3 of 24) of stented patients (P = .9). The stented group had significantly higher pre‐intervention stenosis (71% vs 64%, P = .01) and lower postintervention stenosis (4% vs 30%, P 
ISSN:0902-0063
1399-0012
DOI:10.1111/ctr.13217