Retinopathy of prematurity: the high cost of screening regional and remote infants

Importance Demand for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening is increasing for infants born at rural and regional hospitals where the service is not generally available. The health system cost for screening regional/remote infants has not been reported. Background The objective of this study is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2018-08, Vol.46 (6), p.645-651
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Tzu‐Ying, Donovan, Tim, Armfield, Nigel, Gole, Glen A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Importance Demand for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening is increasing for infants born at rural and regional hospitals where the service is not generally available. The health system cost for screening regional/remote infants has not been reported. Background The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost of ROP screening at a large centralized tertiary neonatal service for infants from regional/rural hospitals. Design This is a retrospective study to establish the cost of transferring regional/rural infants to the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital for ROP screening over a 28‐month period. Participants A total of 131 infants were included in this study. Methods Individual infant costs were calculated from analysis of clinical and administrative records. Main Outcome Measures Economic cost of ROP screening for all transfers from regional/rural hospitals to Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital. Results The average economic cost of ROP screening for this cohort was AUD$5110 per infant screened and the total cost was AUD$669 413. The average cost per infant screened was highest for infants from a regional centre with a population of 75 000 (AUD$14 856 per child), which was also geographically furthest from Brisbane. No infant in this cohort transferred from a regional nursery reached criteria for intervention for ROP by standard guidelines. Conclusions and Relevance Health system costs for ROP screening of remote infants at a centralized hospital are high. Alternative strategies using telemedicine can now be compared with centralized screening.
ISSN:1442-6404
1442-9071
DOI:10.1111/ceo.13160