Circulating small-sized endothelial microparticles as predictors of clinical outcome after chemotherapy for breast cancer: an exploratory analysis

Purpose Therapeutic exploitation of angiogenesis in breast cancer has been limited by the lack of reliable biomarkers. Circulating small-sized endothelial microparticles (sEMP) are likely to play a significant role as messengers of angiogenesis. Higher levels of EMP have been observed in cancer pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2018-05, Vol.169 (1), p.83-92
Hauptverfasser: García Garre, Elisa, Luengo Gil, Ginés, Montoro García, Silvia, Gonzalez Billalabeitia, Enrique, Zafra Poves, Marta, García Martinez, Elena, Roldán Schilling, Vanessa, Navarro Manzano, Esther, Ivars Rubio, Alejandra, Lip, Gregory Y. H., Ayala de la Peña, Francisco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Therapeutic exploitation of angiogenesis in breast cancer has been limited by the lack of reliable biomarkers. Circulating small-sized endothelial microparticles (sEMP) are likely to play a significant role as messengers of angiogenesis. Higher levels of EMP have been observed in cancer patients, but their prognostic value in breast cancer is unknown. Our aim was to determine the value of circulating sEMP as a marker of response to chemotherapy in breast cancer. Methods We included patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant or first-line chemotherapy. Baseline and post-treatment circulating sEMP (CD144+) were quantified using a flow cytometer approach specifically designed for analysis of small-sized particles (0.1–0.5 μm). Small-sized EMP response was defined as a post-treatment decrease of sEMP larger than the median decrease of sEMP after chemotherapy. Baseline and post-chemotherapy VEGFA levels were determined with ELISA. Results Forty-four breast cancer patients were included (19 with metastatic and 25 with locally advanced disease). Median levels of sEMP decreased after chemotherapy ( P  = 0.005). Response to chemotherapy showed a non-significant trend to associate with sEMP response ( P  = 0.056). A sEMP response was observed in 51% of patients and was associated with better overall survival (HR 0.18; 95% CI 0.04–0.87; P  = 0.02) and progression free survival (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.09–0.99; P  = 0.04) in the group of women with metastatic disease. Post-chemotherapy decrease of VEGFA levels was not associated with breast cancer prognosis. Conclusions Our results did not support sEMP as a marker of response to chemotherapy. However, our exploratory analysis suggests that in patients with metastatic breast cancer, the decrease of sEMP levels after chemotherapy is associated with better overall and disease free survival and might be superior to VEGFA levels as an angiogenesis-related prognostic marker.
ISSN:0167-6806
1573-7217
DOI:10.1007/s10549-017-4656-z