Translating international HIV treatment guidelines into local priorities in Indonesia
Objective International guidelines recommend countries to expand antiretroviral therapy (ART) to all HIV‐infected individuals and establish local‐level priorities in relation to other treatment, prevention and mitigation interventions through fair processes. However, no practical guidance is provide...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tropical medicine & international health 2018-03, Vol.23 (3), p.279-294 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
International guidelines recommend countries to expand antiretroviral therapy (ART) to all HIV‐infected individuals and establish local‐level priorities in relation to other treatment, prevention and mitigation interventions through fair processes. However, no practical guidance is provided for such priority‐setting processes. Evidence‐informed deliberative processes (EDPs) fill this gap and combine stakeholder deliberation to incorporate relevant social values with rational decision‐making informed by evidence on these values. This study reports on the first‐time implementation and evaluation of an EDP in HIV control, organised to support the AIDS Commission in West Java province, Indonesia, in the development of its strategic plan for 2014–2018.
Methods
Under the responsibility of the provincial AIDS Commission, an EDP was implemented to select priority interventions using six steps: (i) situational analysis; (ii) formation of a multistakeholder Consultation Panel; (iii) selection of criteria; (iv) identification and assessment of interventions’ performance; (v) deliberation; and (vi) selection of funding and implementing institutions. An independent researcher conducted in‐depth interviews (n = 21) with panel members to evaluate the process.
Results
The Consultation Panel included 23 stakeholders. They identified 50 interventions and these were evaluated against four criteria: impact on the epidemic, stigma reduction, cost‐effectiveness and universal coverage. After a deliberative discussion, the Consultation Panel prioritised a combination of several treatment, prevention and mitigation interventions.
Conclusion
The EDP improved both stakeholder involvement and the evidence base for the strategic planning process. EDPs fill an important gap which international guidelines and current tools for strategic planning in HIV control leave unaddressed.
Objectif
Les directives internationales recommandent aux pays d’étendre le traitement antirétroviral (ART) à toutes les personnes infectées par le VIH et d’établir des priorités au niveau local en rapport avec d'autres interventions de traitement, de prévention et de mitigation à travers des processus réalistes. Cependant, aucune orientation pratique n'est fournie pour ces processus d’établissement des priorités. Les processus délibératifs fondés sur des évidences (PDE) comblent cette lacune et combinent la délibération des intervenants pour incorporer les valeurs sociales pertinentes à la prise de déc |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1360-2276 1365-3156 |
DOI: | 10.1111/tmi.13031 |