Predictors of analgesic efficacy of neurolytic celiac plexus block in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: the importance of timing

Background Neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) is a safe and effective method for reducing abdominal cancer pain. However, the analgesic efficacy of NCPB is not always guaranteed. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify predictors for the analgesic efficacy of NCPB in patients with unr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2018-06, Vol.26 (6), p.2023-2030
Hauptverfasser: Yoon, Duck Mi, Yoon, Kyung Bong, Baek, In Chan, Ko, Seo Hee, Kim, Shin Hyung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) is a safe and effective method for reducing abdominal cancer pain. However, the analgesic efficacy of NCPB is not always guaranteed. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify predictors for the analgesic efficacy of NCPB in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Methods Patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who underwent NCPB from 2006 to 2015 were enrolled. Good analgesia after NCPB was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in pain score at day 30. Patient demographics, cancer characteristics, and pain-related factors were evaluated using a logistic regression analysis to identify predictors for good analgesia after NCPB. Additionally, survival outcomes were compared between patients with poor and good analgesia after NCPB. Results A total of 112 patients satisfied the study protocol requirements. Forty-seven patients (41.9%) showed good analgesia after NCPB. Better performance status, lower serum CA 19-9 level, shorter pain duration, and lower opioid dose were observed in patients with good analgesia after NCPB. Good performance status (ECOG performance status 1 vs. 2 or 3, OR = 2.737, 95% CI = 1.149 to 6.518, P  = 0.023) and low daily opioid use (
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-018-4043-2