Labiaplasty: Indications and Predictors of Postoperative Sequelae in 451 Consecutive Cases
Abstract Background The increasing demand for labiaplasty is well recognized; however, the procedure remains contentious. Objectives We aim to provide a large-scale, up-to-date analysis of labiaplasty outcomes and factors influencing postoperative sequelae (POS). Methods We analyzed a single-center,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aesthetic surgery journal 2018-05, Vol.38 (6), p.644-653 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background
The increasing demand for labiaplasty is well recognized; however, the procedure remains contentious.
Objectives
We aim to provide a large-scale, up-to-date analysis of labiaplasty outcomes and factors influencing postoperative sequelae (POS).
Methods
We analyzed a single-center, prospectively maintained database of females undergoing labiaplasty between 2002 and 2017. Demographic, procedural, and outcomes' data were retrieved. Binary logistic regressions were used to evaluate the odds of developing POS (revisional surgery and complications); presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results
Data for 451 consecutive patients were retrieved, ten of whom were 0.05 for all). On univariable analysis, increased odds of POS occurred with sexual dysfunction as an indication for surgery (OR 3.778, CI 1.682-8.483). On subgroup analysis of those ≥18 years, both smoking (2.576, CI 1.044-6.357) and sexual dysfunction as an indication (OR 4.022, CI 1.772-9.131) increased the odds of POS. On multivariable analysis of the subgroup, sexual dysfunction as an indication persisted in significance (OR 3.850, CI 1.683-8.807).
Conclusions
Results compare favorably with previously reported complication and revisional surgery rates. Smoking and sexual dysfunction may increase the risk of complications.
Level of Evidence: 2 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1090-820X 1527-330X |
DOI: | 10.1093/asj/sjx241 |