The promising future of ventricular restraint therapy for the management of end-stage heart failure

Complicated pathophysiological syndrome associated with irregular functioning of the heart leading to insufficient blood supply to the organs is linked to congestive heart failure (CHF) which is the leading cause of death in developed countries. Numerous factors can add to heart failure (HF) pathogenesis, including myocardial infarction (MI), genetic factors, coronary artery disease (CAD), ischemia or hypertension. Presently, most of the therapies against CHF cause modest symptom relief but incapable of giving significant recovery for long-term survival outcomes. Unfortunately, there is no effective treatment of HF except cardiac transplantation but genetic variations, tissue mismatch, differences in certain immune response and socioeconomic crisis are some major concern with cardiac transplantation, suggested an alternate bridge to transplant (BTT) or destination therapies (DT). Ventricular restraint therapy (VRT) is a promising, non-transplant surgical treatment wherein the overall goal is to wrap the dilated heart with prosthetic material to mechanically restrain the heart at end-diastole, stop extra remodeling, and thereby ultimately improve patient symptoms, ventricular function and survival. Ventricular restraint devices (VRDs) are developed to treat end-stage HF and BTT, including the CorCap cardiac support device (CSD) (CSD; Acorn Cardiovascular Inc, St Paul, Minn), Paracor HeartNet (Paracor Medical, Sunnyvale, Calif), QVR (Polyzen Inc, Apex, NC) and ASD (ASD, X. Zhou). An overview of 4 restraint devices, with their precise advantages and disadvantages, will be presented. The accessible peer-reviewed literature summarized with an important considerations on the mechanism of restraint therapy and how this acquaintance can be accustomed to optimize and improve its effectiveness.