A Novel Rubric to Evaluate Wearable Cameras for Assessment of Interrater Reliability

Research has reported on traditional methods of assessing interrater reliability but, currently, no such standard protocol exists for selection of alternative methods of assessing interrater reliability, such as wearable video cameras. The professions of occupational therapy and occupational science...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:OTJR (Thorofare, N.J.) N.J.), 2018-04, Vol.38 (2), p.121-130
Hauptverfasser: Jozkowski, Amanda C., Presgraves, Echo A., Hodges, Krista L., Wirth, Erica N., Brandstetter, Nicole E., Thayer, Molly T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Research has reported on traditional methods of assessing interrater reliability but, currently, no such standard protocol exists for selection of alternative methods of assessing interrater reliability, such as wearable video cameras. The professions of occupational therapy and occupational science take a unique ecological perspective when evaluating individuals, which focuses on the naturalistic perspective of an individual, ideally resulting in optimal performance. Given current advancements in technology, wearable, low-cost, unobtrusive, first-person view digital video cameras are readily available for use in research. The researchers generated an original rubric for critiquing cameras, then trialed four cameras for use in a future interrater reliability study. This standardized protocol fills a gap in the field and can be used by future researchers searching for a standardized method of camera selection.
ISSN:1539-4492
1938-2383
DOI:10.1177/1539449217753349