Prospective surveillance pilot of rivaroxaban safety within the US Food and Drug Administration Sentinel System

Purpose The US Food and Drug Administration's Sentinel system developed tools for sequential surveillance. Methods In patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation, we sequentially compared outcomes for new users of rivaroxaban versus warfarin, employing propensity score matching and Cox regre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety 2018-03, Vol.27 (3), p.263-271
Hauptverfasser: Chrischilles, Elizabeth A., Gagne, Joshua J., Fireman, Bruce, Nelson, Jennifer, Toh, Sengwee, Shoaibi, Azadeh, Reichman, Marsha E., Wang, Shirley, Nguyen, Michael, Zhang, Rongmei, Izem, Rima, Goulding, Margie R., Southworth, Mary Ross, Graham, David J., Fuller, Candace, Katcoff, Hannah, Woodworth, Tiffany, Rogers, Catherine, Saliga, Ryan, Lin, Nancy D., McMahill‐Walraven, Cheryl N., Nair, Vinit P., Haynes, Kevin, Carnahan, Ryan M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The US Food and Drug Administration's Sentinel system developed tools for sequential surveillance. Methods In patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation, we sequentially compared outcomes for new users of rivaroxaban versus warfarin, employing propensity score matching and Cox regression. A total of 36 173 rivaroxaban and 79 520 warfarin initiators were variable‐ratio matched within 2 monitoring periods. Results Statistically significant signals were observed for ischemic stroke (IS) (first period) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (second period) favoring rivaroxaban, and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) (second period) favoring warfarin. In follow‐up analyses using primary position diagnoses from inpatient encounters for increased definition specificity, the hazard ratios (HR) for rivaroxaban vs warfarin new users were 0.61 (0.47, 0.79) for IS, 1.47 (1.29, 1.67) for GIB, and 0.71 (0.50, 1.01) for ICH. For GIB, the HR varied by age:
ISSN:1053-8569
1099-1557
DOI:10.1002/pds.4375