Mechanism of nanoparticle-induced hypersensitivity in pigs: complement or not complement?

•Pigs provide a sensitive model for the hypersensitivity reactions to nanodrugs.•Previous studies suggest a role of complement activation in these reactions.•A recent study suggested complement-independent phagocytosis as the mechanism.•This paper suggests that in vitro data cannot exclude complemen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug discovery today 2018-03, Vol.23 (3), p.487-492
1. Verfasser: Szebeni, János
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Pigs provide a sensitive model for the hypersensitivity reactions to nanodrugs.•Previous studies suggest a role of complement activation in these reactions.•A recent study suggested complement-independent phagocytosis as the mechanism.•This paper suggests that in vitro data cannot exclude complement activation in vivo.•It is proposed that the data support the ‘double-hit’ theory of hypersensitivity. A recent study on nanoparticle-induced hypersensitivity reactions in pigs showed robust pulmonary intravascular macrophage clearance of Polybead® carboxylate microspheres in mediating the adverse cardiopulmonary distress, irrespective of the ability of these particles to activate the complement (C) system in vitro. Focusing on this observation, this article highlights the controversies in projecting in vitro C assay data to in vivo conditions and applying data on polystyrene particles to therapeutic nanopharmaceuticals. Based on overwhelming evidence of a role of anaphylatoxins in hypersensitivity reactions, the need to further explore the role of C activation in the reported and other reactions is highlighted. C-activation-related and C-independent pseudoallergies (CARPA and CIPA) can proceed simultaneously, as outlined by the ‘double-hit’ hypothesis.
ISSN:1359-6446
1878-5832
DOI:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.025