Safety and efficacy of transpapillary bridged bilateral side-by-side stenting for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction
To the Editor:Biliary drainage is most frequently performed among endoscopic procedures using pancreatobiliary endoscopy.A large-diameter metallic stent can significantly extend the patency period rather than a plastic stent for extrahepatic biliary stricture.[1] However, the optimal drainage for th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international 2017-12, Vol.16 (6), p.659-661 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:Biliary drainage is most frequently performed among endoscopic procedures using pancreatobiliary endoscopy.A large-diameter metallic stent can significantly extend the patency period rather than a plastic stent for extrahepatic biliary stricture.[1] However, the optimal drainage for the hilar biliary obstruction is still controversial.Various techniques have been attempted for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction.[2] There are also some controversies regarding unilateral versus bilateral liver drainage.[3, 4] Recent studies have reported that at least 50% drainage of liver volume achieves sufficient efficacy or longer survival in patients with malignant hilar obstruction.[3, 5] Therefore, multiple kinds of endoscopic placements of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs)may be required. However, despite recent innovations in endoscopic technology, bilateral SEMS placement may be difficult and challenging. As the reasons, insert a second stent through tight stricture, adjustment of the lower end of the SEMSs, and re-intervention under fluoroscopy are difficult associated with bilateral side-by-side stenting. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1499-3872 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1499-3872(17)60072-9 |