Two Thyroid Stimulating Hormone assays correlated in clinical practice show disagreement in subclinical hypothyroidism patients

Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) levels are related to the pituitary gland's ability to detect thyroid hormone concentration. Many studies have analyzed the correlation between TSH and T4, demonstrating a complex system correlation. This complex system may vary among different TSH levels and p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical biochemistry 2018-03, Vol.53, p.13-18
Hauptverfasser: da Silva, Valdelena Alessandra, de Almeida, Robson José, Cavalcante, Marcele Pimenta, Pereira Junior, Lucio Antonio, Reis, Francine Machado, Pereira, Mariana Fabbris, Kasamatsu, Teresa S., Camacho, Cleber P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) levels are related to the pituitary gland's ability to detect thyroid hormone concentration. Many studies have analyzed the correlation between TSH and T4, demonstrating a complex system correlation. This complex system may vary among different TSH levels and patients. The main purpose of this study is to assess the correlation and agreement of serum TSH measured with two assays in different settings. We evaluated healthy individuals as well as subclinical or overt hypothyroid patients. Eighty participants had TSH levels measured by Cobas Roche Elecsys 600 (Roche Diagnostics) and Abbott Architect I 2000 (Abbott Diagnostics). The TSH methods correlations were established with Pearson's correlation, and the strength of the agreement was determined by the McBride scale. The paired Student's t-test was applied to evaluate TSH values from both methods. The one-sample t-test was used to evaluate the difference between TSH values. The agreement was also assessed by a Bland-Altman plot. A regression analysis was applied to the correlation between TSH and T4. There was a significant difference in TSH values measured by the two methods (p
ISSN:0009-9120
1873-2933
DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.12.005