Effects of microwave‐assisted hot water treatments designed against Mexican fruit fly (Anastrepha ludens) on grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) quality

BACKGROUND Hot water treatment (HWT) against Anastrepha ludens was developed achieving 48 °C in the core of grapefruits and holding it for 6 min. After heating, the grapefruits were hydro‐cooled and stored at 23 °C and analyzed for 16 days. The effect of microwave‐assisted HWT (MW‐HWT) on grapefruit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the science of food and agriculture 2018-08, Vol.98 (10), p.3659-3666
Hauptverfasser: Soto‐Reyes, Nohemi, López‐Malo, Aurelio, Rojas‐Laguna, Roberto, Gómez‐Salazar, Julián Andrés, Sosa‐Morales, María Elena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND Hot water treatment (HWT) against Anastrepha ludens was developed achieving 48 °C in the core of grapefruits and holding it for 6 min. After heating, the grapefruits were hydro‐cooled and stored at 23 °C and analyzed for 16 days. The effect of microwave‐assisted HWT (MW‐HWT) on grapefruit quality was analyzed and compared with the quality of fruits treated with HWT and control fruits (without treatment). The physicochemical properties and chemical composition of essential oil were analyzed. RESULTS MW‐HWT was equivalent to HWT according to accumulated heat calculations, with the advantage of being shorter. Treatments significantly affected the weight, color, maturity index, juice content, firmness, titratable acidity, pH, and ascorbic acid content of the grapefruits (P  0.05). The major components identified in the essential oil were d‐limonene and β‐myrcene, compounds responsible of the scent of the grapefruits. CONCLUSION MW‐HWT was shorter (130 min) and had a lesser effect on the quality of the grapefruit when compared with fruits under HWT (188 min duration). Thus, this treatment could be considered as an alternative method against the Mexican fruit fly in grapefruit. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry
ISSN:0022-5142
1097-0010
DOI:10.1002/jsfa.8844