Is state-dependent valuation more adaptive than simpler rules?

•We explain deviations from rational behavior in terms of computational limitations.•The explanation is arguably much simpler than one proposed earlier by McNamara et al.•This approach connects work in computer science, cognitive science, and economics to biology. McNamara et al. (2012) claim to pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural processes 2018-02, Vol.147, p.33-37
Hauptverfasser: Halpern, Joseph Y., Seeman, Lior
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We explain deviations from rational behavior in terms of computational limitations.•The explanation is arguably much simpler than one proposed earlier by McNamara et al.•This approach connects work in computer science, cognitive science, and economics to biology. McNamara et al. (2012) claim to provide an explanation of certain systematic deviations from rational behavior using a mechanism that could arise through natural selection. We provide an arguably much simpler mechanism in terms of computational limitations, that performs better in the environment described by McNamara et al. (2012). To argue convincingly that animals’ use of state-dependent valuation is adaptive and is likely to be selected for by natural selection, one must argue that, in some sense, it is a better approach than the simple strategies that we propose.
ISSN:0376-6357
1872-8308
DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2017.12.001