Kit Expression in Male Germ Cell Tumors
Objective: KIT functions as the receptor for stem cell factor (SCF) and this interaction is essential for regulation of proliferation and survival, particularly for germ cells since it regulates oogenesis, folliculogenesis and spermatogenesis. Up-regulation of KIT signalling has been associated with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anticancer research 2007-05, Vol.27 (3B), p.1685-1688 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: KIT functions as the receptor for stem cell factor (SCF) and this interaction is essential for regulation of proliferation
and survival, particularly for germ cells since it regulates oogenesis, folliculogenesis and spermatogenesis. Up-regulation
of KIT signalling has been associated with oncogenic transformation in cells expressing the molecule. Our objective was to
investigate the expression of KIT in germ cell tumor patients and correlate it with the patients' clinical characteristics.
Patients and Methods: One hundred and seventy-three archival blocks of formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from
histologically confirmed germ cell tumor (GCT) patients were included in the study. Immunohistochemical staining for KIT was
performed and the percentage of positive cells was calculated by an independent pathologist. KIT expression was considered
as positive if >10% of tumor cells displayed membranous or cytoplasmic staining. Results: Sixty-one patients with seminomatous
(49 pure, 11 anaplastic, 1 spermocytic) and 112 with non-seminomatous GCTs (36 malignant teratoma undifferentiated (MTU),
15 malignant teratoma trophoblastic (MTT), 20 malignant teratoma intermediate (MTI), 35 malignant teratoma combined (MTC)
and six others) were identified. Among pure seminoma patients, 38 (77.5%) revealed a positive staining for KIT, while only
two out of eleven (18.2%) anaplastic seminoma patients were identified as positive. This difference was statistically significant
(p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0250-7005 1791-7530 |