Rapid Analysis of Cocaine and Metabolites in Urine Using a Completely Automated Solid-Phase Extraction-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method

A rapid, simple, and completely automated method for the analysis of cocaine and its metabolites in urine has been developed. The method utilizes online solid-phase extraction (SPE) with liquid chromatographic separation and tandem mass spectrometric detection (MS-MS). An efficient online SPE proced...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of analytical toxicology 2008-10, Vol.32 (8), p.570-576
Hauptverfasser: Jagerdeo, Eshwar, Montgomery, Madeline A., Sibum, Martin, Sasaki, Tania A., LeBeau, Marc A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A rapid, simple, and completely automated method for the analysis of cocaine and its metabolites in urine has been developed. The method utilizes online solid-phase extraction (SPE) with liquid chromatographic separation and tandem mass spectrometric detection (MS-MS). An efficient online SPE procedure was developed using Hysphere™ MM anion sorbent. A gradient chromatography method with a Gemini C6-Phenyl (50 × 3.00-mm i.d., 5 µm) column was used for the separation of all compounds. Detection was by positive ion mode electrospray ionization MS-MS. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was used to enhance the selectivity and sensitivity of the method. Two MRM transitions were monitored for each analyte and one transition for each internal standard. Linearity was analyte-dependent but generally ranged from 7 to 1000 ng/mL. The limits of detection for the method ranged from 3 to 23 ng/mL and the limits of quantitation ranged from 7 to 69 ng/mL. Quality control (QC) samples were analyzed for each analyte in triplicate at 50, 200, and 800 ng/mL. The bias and precision were determined using a simple analysis of variance (ANOVA: single factor). The results demonstrated bias as < 5% and % precision as < 9% for all components at each QC level.
ISSN:0146-4760
1945-2403
DOI:10.1093/jat/32.8.570