Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?
An analysis of biotech and pharma stock prices since 1930 reveals sharp differences in the risk-adjusted returns of the two sectors. Uncertainty surrounding the risk and reward of investments in biopharmaceutical companies poses a challenge to those interested in funding such enterprises. Using data...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature biotechnology 2017-12, Vol.35 (12), p.1149-1157 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1157 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1149 |
container_title | Nature biotechnology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Thakor, Richard T Anaya, Nicholas Zhang, Yuwei Vilanilam, Christian Siah, Kien Wei Wong, Chi Heem Lo, Andrew W |
description | An analysis of biotech and pharma stock prices since 1930 reveals sharp differences in the risk-adjusted returns of the two sectors.
Uncertainty surrounding the risk and reward of investments in biopharmaceutical companies poses a challenge to those interested in funding such enterprises. Using data on publicly traded stocks, we track the performance of 1,066 biopharmaceutical companies from 1930 to 2015—the most comprehensive financial analysis of this sector to date. Our systematic exploration of methods for distinguishing biotech and pharmaceutical companies yields a dynamic, more accurate classification method. We find that the performance of the biotech sector is highly sensitive to the presence of a few outlier companies, and confirm that nearly all biotech companies are loss-making enterprises, exhibiting high stock volatility. In contrast, since 2000, pharmaceutical companies have become increasingly profitable, with risk-adjusted returns consistently outperforming the market. The performance of all biopharmaceutical companies is subject not only to factors arising from their drug pipelines (idiosyncratic risk), but also from general economic conditions (systematic risk). The risk associated with returns has profound implications both for patterns of investment and for funding innovation in biomedical R&D. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nbt.4023 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1975020410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A517909927</galeid><sourcerecordid>A517909927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-66b938897fb4322c8788e2acebbbde271501912dff29c33fa0d70f6f09b6a2d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNku1r1TAYxYMobrsK_gVS8IsDe03SNm1AkDGmTgYD376GJE16M9rkmifdy3-_XHZ1u8MPUkhD8nsOJ4eD0CuClwRX3Xuv0rLGtHqC9klTs5Iwzp7mPe7aEpOG7aEDgAuMMasZe472KKcU46reRx--zpCKVbgqhhD6QvrC-UsDaTI-FQ6KtDKFcmG9knGS2szJaTkWYHQK8eML9MzKEczL7X-Bfn46-XH8pTw7_3x6fHRW6oa0qWRM8arreGtVXVGqu7brDM1qSqne0JY0mHBCe2sp11VlJe5bbJnFXDFJ-65aoLd3uusYfs_ZnZgcaDOO0pswgyC8bTDFdc5igd48Qi_CHH12t6Hq_OrM3lODHI1w3oYUpd6IiqNsmWPOaZup5T-o_PVmcjp4Y10-3xk43BnITDLXaZAzgDj9_u3_2fNfu-y7B6yawXkDeQE3rBLcjezg27h0DADRWLGObpLxRhAsNn0RuS9i05eMvt7GNavJ9H_BPwW5twn5yg8mPsjzsdgt2rnDpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1974200975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?</title><source>Nature</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Thakor, Richard T ; Anaya, Nicholas ; Zhang, Yuwei ; Vilanilam, Christian ; Siah, Kien Wei ; Wong, Chi Heem ; Lo, Andrew W</creator><creatorcontrib>Thakor, Richard T ; Anaya, Nicholas ; Zhang, Yuwei ; Vilanilam, Christian ; Siah, Kien Wei ; Wong, Chi Heem ; Lo, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><description>An analysis of biotech and pharma stock prices since 1930 reveals sharp differences in the risk-adjusted returns of the two sectors.
Uncertainty surrounding the risk and reward of investments in biopharmaceutical companies poses a challenge to those interested in funding such enterprises. Using data on publicly traded stocks, we track the performance of 1,066 biopharmaceutical companies from 1930 to 2015—the most comprehensive financial analysis of this sector to date. Our systematic exploration of methods for distinguishing biotech and pharmaceutical companies yields a dynamic, more accurate classification method. We find that the performance of the biotech sector is highly sensitive to the presence of a few outlier companies, and confirm that nearly all biotech companies are loss-making enterprises, exhibiting high stock volatility. In contrast, since 2000, pharmaceutical companies have become increasingly profitable, with risk-adjusted returns consistently outperforming the market. The performance of all biopharmaceutical companies is subject not only to factors arising from their drug pipelines (idiosyncratic risk), but also from general economic conditions (systematic risk). The risk associated with returns has profound implications both for patterns of investment and for funding innovation in biomedical R&D.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1087-0156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-1696</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29220034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>631/154/2426 ; 631/61 ; 692/308/153 ; 692/700/3934 ; 706/689/159 ; Agriculture ; Bioinformatics ; Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology ; Biomedicine ; Biopharmaceuticals ; Biotechnology ; Biotechnology industries ; Biotechnology industry ; Economic conditions ; Funding ; Innovations ; Investment ; Investments ; Life Sciences ; Management ; Medical innovations ; Methods ; perspective ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmaceuticals ; Pipelines ; Portfolio management ; R&D ; Reinforcement ; Research & development ; Risk ; Risk management ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Nature biotechnology, 2017-12, Vol.35 (12), p.1149-1157</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature America, Inc. 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Dec 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-66b938897fb4322c8788e2acebbbde271501912dff29c33fa0d70f6f09b6a2d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-66b938897fb4322c8788e2acebbbde271501912dff29c33fa0d70f6f09b6a2d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2944-7773</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29220034$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thakor, Richard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anaya, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilanilam, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siah, Kien Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Chi Heem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><title>Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?</title><title>Nature biotechnology</title><addtitle>Nat Biotechnol</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Biotechnol</addtitle><description>An analysis of biotech and pharma stock prices since 1930 reveals sharp differences in the risk-adjusted returns of the two sectors.
Uncertainty surrounding the risk and reward of investments in biopharmaceutical companies poses a challenge to those interested in funding such enterprises. Using data on publicly traded stocks, we track the performance of 1,066 biopharmaceutical companies from 1930 to 2015—the most comprehensive financial analysis of this sector to date. Our systematic exploration of methods for distinguishing biotech and pharmaceutical companies yields a dynamic, more accurate classification method. We find that the performance of the biotech sector is highly sensitive to the presence of a few outlier companies, and confirm that nearly all biotech companies are loss-making enterprises, exhibiting high stock volatility. In contrast, since 2000, pharmaceutical companies have become increasingly profitable, with risk-adjusted returns consistently outperforming the market. The performance of all biopharmaceutical companies is subject not only to factors arising from their drug pipelines (idiosyncratic risk), but also from general economic conditions (systematic risk). The risk associated with returns has profound implications both for patterns of investment and for funding innovation in biomedical R&D.</description><subject>631/154/2426</subject><subject>631/61</subject><subject>692/308/153</subject><subject>692/700/3934</subject><subject>706/689/159</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Biotechnology industries</subject><subject>Biotechnology industry</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical innovations</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>perspective</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>Portfolio management</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>1087-0156</issn><issn>1546-1696</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNku1r1TAYxYMobrsK_gVS8IsDe03SNm1AkDGmTgYD376GJE16M9rkmifdy3-_XHZ1u8MPUkhD8nsOJ4eD0CuClwRX3Xuv0rLGtHqC9klTs5Iwzp7mPe7aEpOG7aEDgAuMMasZe472KKcU46reRx--zpCKVbgqhhD6QvrC-UsDaTI-FQ6KtDKFcmG9knGS2szJaTkWYHQK8eML9MzKEczL7X-Bfn46-XH8pTw7_3x6fHRW6oa0qWRM8arreGtVXVGqu7brDM1qSqne0JY0mHBCe2sp11VlJe5bbJnFXDFJ-65aoLd3uusYfs_ZnZgcaDOO0pswgyC8bTDFdc5igd48Qi_CHH12t6Hq_OrM3lODHI1w3oYUpd6IiqNsmWPOaZup5T-o_PVmcjp4Y10-3xk43BnITDLXaZAzgDj9_u3_2fNfu-y7B6yawXkDeQE3rBLcjezg27h0DADRWLGObpLxRhAsNn0RuS9i05eMvt7GNavJ9H_BPwW5twn5yg8mPsjzsdgt2rnDpA</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Thakor, Richard T</creator><creator>Anaya, Nicholas</creator><creator>Zhang, Yuwei</creator><creator>Vilanilam, Christian</creator><creator>Siah, Kien Wei</creator><creator>Wong, Chi Heem</creator><creator>Lo, Andrew W</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2944-7773</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?</title><author>Thakor, Richard T ; Anaya, Nicholas ; Zhang, Yuwei ; Vilanilam, Christian ; Siah, Kien Wei ; Wong, Chi Heem ; Lo, Andrew W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-66b938897fb4322c8788e2acebbbde271501912dff29c33fa0d70f6f09b6a2d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>631/154/2426</topic><topic>631/61</topic><topic>692/308/153</topic><topic>692/700/3934</topic><topic>706/689/159</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Biotechnology industries</topic><topic>Biotechnology industry</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical innovations</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>perspective</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>Portfolio management</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thakor, Richard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anaya, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilanilam, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siah, Kien Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Chi Heem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thakor, Richard T</au><au>Anaya, Nicholas</au><au>Zhang, Yuwei</au><au>Vilanilam, Christian</au><au>Siah, Kien Wei</au><au>Wong, Chi Heem</au><au>Lo, Andrew W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?</atitle><jtitle>Nature biotechnology</jtitle><stitle>Nat Biotechnol</stitle><addtitle>Nat Biotechnol</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1149</spage><epage>1157</epage><pages>1149-1157</pages><issn>1087-0156</issn><eissn>1546-1696</eissn><abstract>An analysis of biotech and pharma stock prices since 1930 reveals sharp differences in the risk-adjusted returns of the two sectors.
Uncertainty surrounding the risk and reward of investments in biopharmaceutical companies poses a challenge to those interested in funding such enterprises. Using data on publicly traded stocks, we track the performance of 1,066 biopharmaceutical companies from 1930 to 2015—the most comprehensive financial analysis of this sector to date. Our systematic exploration of methods for distinguishing biotech and pharmaceutical companies yields a dynamic, more accurate classification method. We find that the performance of the biotech sector is highly sensitive to the presence of a few outlier companies, and confirm that nearly all biotech companies are loss-making enterprises, exhibiting high stock volatility. In contrast, since 2000, pharmaceutical companies have become increasingly profitable, with risk-adjusted returns consistently outperforming the market. The performance of all biopharmaceutical companies is subject not only to factors arising from their drug pipelines (idiosyncratic risk), but also from general economic conditions (systematic risk). The risk associated with returns has profound implications both for patterns of investment and for funding innovation in biomedical R&D.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>29220034</pmid><doi>10.1038/nbt.4023</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2944-7773</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1087-0156 |
ispartof | Nature biotechnology, 2017-12, Vol.35 (12), p.1149-1157 |
issn | 1087-0156 1546-1696 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1975020410 |
source | Nature; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | 631/154/2426 631/61 692/308/153 692/700/3934 706/689/159 Agriculture Bioinformatics Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology Biomedicine Biopharmaceuticals Biotechnology Biotechnology industries Biotechnology industry Economic conditions Funding Innovations Investment Investments Life Sciences Management Medical innovations Methods perspective Pharmaceutical industry Pharmaceuticals Pipelines Portfolio management R&D Reinforcement Research & development Risk Risk management Volatility |
title | Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Just%20how%20good%20an%20investment%20is%20the%20biopharmaceutical%20sector?&rft.jtitle=Nature%20biotechnology&rft.au=Thakor,%20Richard%20T&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1149&rft.epage=1157&rft.pages=1149-1157&rft.issn=1087-0156&rft.eissn=1546-1696&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nbt.4023&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA517909927%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1974200975&rft_id=info:pmid/29220034&rft_galeid=A517909927&rfr_iscdi=true |