Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?

An analysis of biotech and pharma stock prices since 1930 reveals sharp differences in the risk-adjusted returns of the two sectors. Uncertainty surrounding the risk and reward of investments in biopharmaceutical companies poses a challenge to those interested in funding such enterprises. Using data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature biotechnology 2017-12, Vol.35 (12), p.1149-1157
Hauptverfasser: Thakor, Richard T, Anaya, Nicholas, Zhang, Yuwei, Vilanilam, Christian, Siah, Kien Wei, Wong, Chi Heem, Lo, Andrew W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1157
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1149
container_title Nature biotechnology
container_volume 35
creator Thakor, Richard T
Anaya, Nicholas
Zhang, Yuwei
Vilanilam, Christian
Siah, Kien Wei
Wong, Chi Heem
Lo, Andrew W
description An analysis of biotech and pharma stock prices since 1930 reveals sharp differences in the risk-adjusted returns of the two sectors. Uncertainty surrounding the risk and reward of investments in biopharmaceutical companies poses a challenge to those interested in funding such enterprises. Using data on publicly traded stocks, we track the performance of 1,066 biopharmaceutical companies from 1930 to 2015—the most comprehensive financial analysis of this sector to date. Our systematic exploration of methods for distinguishing biotech and pharmaceutical companies yields a dynamic, more accurate classification method. We find that the performance of the biotech sector is highly sensitive to the presence of a few outlier companies, and confirm that nearly all biotech companies are loss-making enterprises, exhibiting high stock volatility. In contrast, since 2000, pharmaceutical companies have become increasingly profitable, with risk-adjusted returns consistently outperforming the market. The performance of all biopharmaceutical companies is subject not only to factors arising from their drug pipelines (idiosyncratic risk), but also from general economic conditions (systematic risk). The risk associated with returns has profound implications both for patterns of investment and for funding innovation in biomedical R&D.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/nbt.4023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1975020410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A517909927</galeid><sourcerecordid>A517909927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-66b938897fb4322c8788e2acebbbde271501912dff29c33fa0d70f6f09b6a2d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNku1r1TAYxYMobrsK_gVS8IsDe03SNm1AkDGmTgYD376GJE16M9rkmifdy3-_XHZ1u8MPUkhD8nsOJ4eD0CuClwRX3Xuv0rLGtHqC9klTs5Iwzp7mPe7aEpOG7aEDgAuMMasZe472KKcU46reRx--zpCKVbgqhhD6QvrC-UsDaTI-FQ6KtDKFcmG9knGS2szJaTkWYHQK8eML9MzKEczL7X-Bfn46-XH8pTw7_3x6fHRW6oa0qWRM8arreGtVXVGqu7brDM1qSqne0JY0mHBCe2sp11VlJe5bbJnFXDFJ-65aoLd3uusYfs_ZnZgcaDOO0pswgyC8bTDFdc5igd48Qi_CHH12t6Hq_OrM3lODHI1w3oYUpd6IiqNsmWPOaZup5T-o_PVmcjp4Y10-3xk43BnITDLXaZAzgDj9_u3_2fNfu-y7B6yawXkDeQE3rBLcjezg27h0DADRWLGObpLxRhAsNn0RuS9i05eMvt7GNavJ9H_BPwW5twn5yg8mPsjzsdgt2rnDpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1974200975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?</title><source>Nature</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Thakor, Richard T ; Anaya, Nicholas ; Zhang, Yuwei ; Vilanilam, Christian ; Siah, Kien Wei ; Wong, Chi Heem ; Lo, Andrew W</creator><creatorcontrib>Thakor, Richard T ; Anaya, Nicholas ; Zhang, Yuwei ; Vilanilam, Christian ; Siah, Kien Wei ; Wong, Chi Heem ; Lo, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><description>An analysis of biotech and pharma stock prices since 1930 reveals sharp differences in the risk-adjusted returns of the two sectors. Uncertainty surrounding the risk and reward of investments in biopharmaceutical companies poses a challenge to those interested in funding such enterprises. Using data on publicly traded stocks, we track the performance of 1,066 biopharmaceutical companies from 1930 to 2015—the most comprehensive financial analysis of this sector to date. Our systematic exploration of methods for distinguishing biotech and pharmaceutical companies yields a dynamic, more accurate classification method. We find that the performance of the biotech sector is highly sensitive to the presence of a few outlier companies, and confirm that nearly all biotech companies are loss-making enterprises, exhibiting high stock volatility. In contrast, since 2000, pharmaceutical companies have become increasingly profitable, with risk-adjusted returns consistently outperforming the market. The performance of all biopharmaceutical companies is subject not only to factors arising from their drug pipelines (idiosyncratic risk), but also from general economic conditions (systematic risk). The risk associated with returns has profound implications both for patterns of investment and for funding innovation in biomedical R&amp;D.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1087-0156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-1696</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29220034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>631/154/2426 ; 631/61 ; 692/308/153 ; 692/700/3934 ; 706/689/159 ; Agriculture ; Bioinformatics ; Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology ; Biomedicine ; Biopharmaceuticals ; Biotechnology ; Biotechnology industries ; Biotechnology industry ; Economic conditions ; Funding ; Innovations ; Investment ; Investments ; Life Sciences ; Management ; Medical innovations ; Methods ; perspective ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmaceuticals ; Pipelines ; Portfolio management ; R&amp;D ; Reinforcement ; Research &amp; development ; Risk ; Risk management ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Nature biotechnology, 2017-12, Vol.35 (12), p.1149-1157</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature America, Inc. 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Dec 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-66b938897fb4322c8788e2acebbbde271501912dff29c33fa0d70f6f09b6a2d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-66b938897fb4322c8788e2acebbbde271501912dff29c33fa0d70f6f09b6a2d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2944-7773</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29220034$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thakor, Richard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anaya, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilanilam, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siah, Kien Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Chi Heem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><title>Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?</title><title>Nature biotechnology</title><addtitle>Nat Biotechnol</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Biotechnol</addtitle><description>An analysis of biotech and pharma stock prices since 1930 reveals sharp differences in the risk-adjusted returns of the two sectors. Uncertainty surrounding the risk and reward of investments in biopharmaceutical companies poses a challenge to those interested in funding such enterprises. Using data on publicly traded stocks, we track the performance of 1,066 biopharmaceutical companies from 1930 to 2015—the most comprehensive financial analysis of this sector to date. Our systematic exploration of methods for distinguishing biotech and pharmaceutical companies yields a dynamic, more accurate classification method. We find that the performance of the biotech sector is highly sensitive to the presence of a few outlier companies, and confirm that nearly all biotech companies are loss-making enterprises, exhibiting high stock volatility. In contrast, since 2000, pharmaceutical companies have become increasingly profitable, with risk-adjusted returns consistently outperforming the market. The performance of all biopharmaceutical companies is subject not only to factors arising from their drug pipelines (idiosyncratic risk), but also from general economic conditions (systematic risk). The risk associated with returns has profound implications both for patterns of investment and for funding innovation in biomedical R&amp;D.</description><subject>631/154/2426</subject><subject>631/61</subject><subject>692/308/153</subject><subject>692/700/3934</subject><subject>706/689/159</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Biotechnology industries</subject><subject>Biotechnology industry</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical innovations</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>perspective</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>Portfolio management</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>1087-0156</issn><issn>1546-1696</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNku1r1TAYxYMobrsK_gVS8IsDe03SNm1AkDGmTgYD376GJE16M9rkmifdy3-_XHZ1u8MPUkhD8nsOJ4eD0CuClwRX3Xuv0rLGtHqC9klTs5Iwzp7mPe7aEpOG7aEDgAuMMasZe472KKcU46reRx--zpCKVbgqhhD6QvrC-UsDaTI-FQ6KtDKFcmG9knGS2szJaTkWYHQK8eML9MzKEczL7X-Bfn46-XH8pTw7_3x6fHRW6oa0qWRM8arreGtVXVGqu7brDM1qSqne0JY0mHBCe2sp11VlJe5bbJnFXDFJ-65aoLd3uusYfs_ZnZgcaDOO0pswgyC8bTDFdc5igd48Qi_CHH12t6Hq_OrM3lODHI1w3oYUpd6IiqNsmWPOaZup5T-o_PVmcjp4Y10-3xk43BnITDLXaZAzgDj9_u3_2fNfu-y7B6yawXkDeQE3rBLcjezg27h0DADRWLGObpLxRhAsNn0RuS9i05eMvt7GNavJ9H_BPwW5twn5yg8mPsjzsdgt2rnDpA</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Thakor, Richard T</creator><creator>Anaya, Nicholas</creator><creator>Zhang, Yuwei</creator><creator>Vilanilam, Christian</creator><creator>Siah, Kien Wei</creator><creator>Wong, Chi Heem</creator><creator>Lo, Andrew W</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2944-7773</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?</title><author>Thakor, Richard T ; Anaya, Nicholas ; Zhang, Yuwei ; Vilanilam, Christian ; Siah, Kien Wei ; Wong, Chi Heem ; Lo, Andrew W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-66b938897fb4322c8788e2acebbbde271501912dff29c33fa0d70f6f09b6a2d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>631/154/2426</topic><topic>631/61</topic><topic>692/308/153</topic><topic>692/700/3934</topic><topic>706/689/159</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Biotechnology industries</topic><topic>Biotechnology industry</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical innovations</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>perspective</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>Portfolio management</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thakor, Richard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anaya, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilanilam, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siah, Kien Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Chi Heem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thakor, Richard T</au><au>Anaya, Nicholas</au><au>Zhang, Yuwei</au><au>Vilanilam, Christian</au><au>Siah, Kien Wei</au><au>Wong, Chi Heem</au><au>Lo, Andrew W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?</atitle><jtitle>Nature biotechnology</jtitle><stitle>Nat Biotechnol</stitle><addtitle>Nat Biotechnol</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1149</spage><epage>1157</epage><pages>1149-1157</pages><issn>1087-0156</issn><eissn>1546-1696</eissn><abstract>An analysis of biotech and pharma stock prices since 1930 reveals sharp differences in the risk-adjusted returns of the two sectors. Uncertainty surrounding the risk and reward of investments in biopharmaceutical companies poses a challenge to those interested in funding such enterprises. Using data on publicly traded stocks, we track the performance of 1,066 biopharmaceutical companies from 1930 to 2015—the most comprehensive financial analysis of this sector to date. Our systematic exploration of methods for distinguishing biotech and pharmaceutical companies yields a dynamic, more accurate classification method. We find that the performance of the biotech sector is highly sensitive to the presence of a few outlier companies, and confirm that nearly all biotech companies are loss-making enterprises, exhibiting high stock volatility. In contrast, since 2000, pharmaceutical companies have become increasingly profitable, with risk-adjusted returns consistently outperforming the market. The performance of all biopharmaceutical companies is subject not only to factors arising from their drug pipelines (idiosyncratic risk), but also from general economic conditions (systematic risk). The risk associated with returns has profound implications both for patterns of investment and for funding innovation in biomedical R&amp;D.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>29220034</pmid><doi>10.1038/nbt.4023</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2944-7773</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1087-0156
ispartof Nature biotechnology, 2017-12, Vol.35 (12), p.1149-1157
issn 1087-0156
1546-1696
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1975020410
source Nature; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 631/154/2426
631/61
692/308/153
692/700/3934
706/689/159
Agriculture
Bioinformatics
Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology
Biomedicine
Biopharmaceuticals
Biotechnology
Biotechnology industries
Biotechnology industry
Economic conditions
Funding
Innovations
Investment
Investments
Life Sciences
Management
Medical innovations
Methods
perspective
Pharmaceutical industry
Pharmaceuticals
Pipelines
Portfolio management
R&D
Reinforcement
Research & development
Risk
Risk management
Volatility
title Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Just%20how%20good%20an%20investment%20is%20the%20biopharmaceutical%20sector?&rft.jtitle=Nature%20biotechnology&rft.au=Thakor,%20Richard%20T&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1149&rft.epage=1157&rft.pages=1149-1157&rft.issn=1087-0156&rft.eissn=1546-1696&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nbt.4023&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA517909927%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1974200975&rft_id=info:pmid/29220034&rft_galeid=A517909927&rfr_iscdi=true