Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?

An analysis of biotech and pharma stock prices since 1930 reveals sharp differences in the risk-adjusted returns of the two sectors. Uncertainty surrounding the risk and reward of investments in biopharmaceutical companies poses a challenge to those interested in funding such enterprises. Using data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature biotechnology 2017-12, Vol.35 (12), p.1149-1157
Hauptverfasser: Thakor, Richard T, Anaya, Nicholas, Zhang, Yuwei, Vilanilam, Christian, Siah, Kien Wei, Wong, Chi Heem, Lo, Andrew W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An analysis of biotech and pharma stock prices since 1930 reveals sharp differences in the risk-adjusted returns of the two sectors. Uncertainty surrounding the risk and reward of investments in biopharmaceutical companies poses a challenge to those interested in funding such enterprises. Using data on publicly traded stocks, we track the performance of 1,066 biopharmaceutical companies from 1930 to 2015—the most comprehensive financial analysis of this sector to date. Our systematic exploration of methods for distinguishing biotech and pharmaceutical companies yields a dynamic, more accurate classification method. We find that the performance of the biotech sector is highly sensitive to the presence of a few outlier companies, and confirm that nearly all biotech companies are loss-making enterprises, exhibiting high stock volatility. In contrast, since 2000, pharmaceutical companies have become increasingly profitable, with risk-adjusted returns consistently outperforming the market. The performance of all biopharmaceutical companies is subject not only to factors arising from their drug pipelines (idiosyncratic risk), but also from general economic conditions (systematic risk). The risk associated with returns has profound implications both for patterns of investment and for funding innovation in biomedical R&D.
ISSN:1087-0156
1546-1696
DOI:10.1038/nbt.4023