Preclinical Evaluation of Gemcitabine Combination Regimens for Application in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
The DNA antimetabolite gemcitabine is an anticancer agent with shown preclinical and clinical utility and a low toxicity profile. In this study, we sought to identify and optimize drug partners for binary and tertiary combinations with gemcitabine for use in the treatment of acute myelogenous leukem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical cancer research 2005-06, Vol.11 (11), p.4225-4233 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The DNA antimetabolite gemcitabine is an anticancer agent with shown preclinical and clinical utility and a low toxicity profile.
In this study, we sought to identify and optimize drug partners for binary and tertiary combinations with gemcitabine for
use in the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Drug interaction was assessed by growth inhibition assay with metabolic
end points. The combination index method was used to evaluate combinations of gemcitabine with fludarabine, paclitaxel, chlorambucil,
doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, and SN-38 in U937 human AML cells. A three-dimensional method was used to determine the effect
of dose ratio and schedule on drug interaction. Mechanisms underlying interactions related to cell cycle effects and apoptosis
were assessed by flow cytometric and caspase-3 and -7 assays, respectively. The most synergistic binary combination was gemcitabine
+ fludarabine. The most synergistic tertiary combination was gemcitabine + fludarabine + paclitaxel, where the interaction
was sequence dependent with paclitaxel given before gemcitabine + fludarabine, producing a 2-fold increase in synergy. Cell
cycle analysis did not reveal a significant G 2 -M arrest, suggesting that the synergistic effect of paclitaxel in this combination, which produced the greatest caspase activation,
might be independent of microtubule stabilization. In contrast, the gemcitabine + fludarabine + mitoxantrone combination was
synergistic and schedule independent. Moreover, few ratios of gemcitabine + fludarabine to mitoxantrone were antagonistic,
which could be important for clinical translation. In conclusion, synergistic interactions with gemcitabine occurred with
several drugs, the most promising being gemcitabine + fludarabine, gemcitabine + fludarabine + paclitaxel, and gemcitabine
+ fludarabine + mitoxantrone. These findings provided a rationale for clinical trials of gemcitabine + fludarabine and gemcitabine
+ mitoxantrone where responses were observed in heavily pretreated AML patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-0432 1557-3265 |
DOI: | 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2106 |