Switching from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a 12‐month multicentre observational prospective cohort study
Summary Background Infliximab biosimilars have become available for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, data showing long‐term safety and effectiveness of biosimilars in IBD patients are limited. Aim To study prospectively the switch from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2018-02, Vol.47 (3), p.356-363 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary
Background
Infliximab biosimilars have become available for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, data showing long‐term safety and effectiveness of biosimilars in IBD patients are limited.
Aim
To study prospectively the switch from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in an IBD cohort with 12 months follow‐up to evaluate safety and effectiveness.
Methods
Adult IBD patients from two hospitals treated with infliximab innovator (Remicade; Janssen Biotech, Horsham , Pennsylvania, USA) were switched to infliximab biosimilar (Inflectra; Hospira, Lake Forest, Illinois, USA) as part of routine care, but in a controlled setting. Blood samples were taken just before the first, second, fourth and seventh infusion of biosimilar. Infliximab trough levels, antibodies‐to‐infliximab (ATI), CRP and ESR were measured and disease activity scores were calculated.
Results
Our cohort consisted of 133 IBD patients (64% CD, 36% UC). Before switching we found widely varying infliximab levels (median 3.5 μg/mL). ATI were detected in eight patients (6%). Most patients were in remission or had mild disease (CD: 82% UC: 90%). After switching to biosimilar, 35 patients (26%) discontinued therapy within 12 months, mostly due to subjective higher disease activity (9%) and adverse events (AE, 9.8%). AE included general malaise/fatigue (n = 7), arthralgia (n = 2), skin problems (n = 2) and infusion reactions (n = 2). No differences in IFX levels, CRP, and disease activity scores were found between the four time points (P ≥ .0917).
Conclusions
We found no differences in drug levels and disease activity between infliximab innovator and biosimilar in our IBD cohort, indicating that biosimilars are safe and effective. The high proportions of discontinuers were mostly due to elective withdrawal or subjective disease worsening.
Linked ContentThis article is linked to van Bodegraven and Boone paper. To view this article visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14509. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0269-2813 1365-2036 |
DOI: | 10.1111/apt.14453 |