Presepsin as a predictor of positive blood culture in suspected neonatal sepsis
Background Although the incidence of neonatal sepsis is decreasing, neonatal sepsis remains a severe life‐threatening disease. No current biochemical marker can provide perfect diagnostic accuracy for neonatal sepsis. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the accuracy of presepsin (P‐SEP)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatrics international 2018-02, Vol.60 (2), p.157-161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Although the incidence of neonatal sepsis is decreasing, neonatal sepsis remains a severe life‐threatening disease. No current biochemical marker can provide perfect diagnostic accuracy for neonatal sepsis. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the accuracy of presepsin (P‐SEP) as a novel biomarker of bacterial infection for neonatal sepsis diagnosis.
Methods
We prospectively studied newborns with sepsis (sepsis group; n = 13) during the first 30 days after birth and compared them with control preterm newborns (control group; n = 18). In addition, we evaluated term newborns with some clinical signs of early onset sepsis (non‐sepsis term group; n = 35).
Results
P‐SEP in the sepsis group was significantly higher than in the control group (P < 0.001) The area under the curve for P‐SEP was 0.868 (95%CI: 0.71–1.00). A P‐SEP cut‐off of 795 pg/mL was established, with 85% sensitivity and 89% specificity. The positive and negative predictive values were 85% and 89%, respectively. In the non‐sepsis term group, P‐SEP had better stability than white blood cells and C‐reactive protein for 3 days after birth.
Conclusions
P‐SEP can better discriminate between infections and non‐infectious inflammatory conditions than the currently used biomarkers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1328-8067 1442-200X |
DOI: | 10.1111/ped.13469 |