Remote ischemic preconditioning upregulates microRNA-21 to protect the kidney in children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common emergencies and severe diseases in the clinic. We sought to verify whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has a protective effect on the kidney of child with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surger...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West) West), 2018-05, Vol.33 (5), p.911-919
Hauptverfasser: Kang, Zhijuan, Li, Zhihui, Huang, Peng, Luo, Jinwen, Liu, Pingbo, Wang, Ying, Xia, Tuanhong, Zhou, Yuhang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common emergencies and severe diseases in the clinic. We sought to verify whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has a protective effect on the kidney of child with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery. We hypothesized it may be related to the up-regulation of microRNA-21 (miR-21). Methods We performed a prospective randomized clinical study among children with congenital heart disease undergoing CPB surgery between January and December 2016. Children were randomized to an RIPC or control group. Patients in each group were divided into an AKI and a non-AKI group according to the occurrence of AKI at 48 h after surgery. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) conducted by blood-pressure cuff was performed 12 h before surgery. Serum creatinine (S Cr ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and miR-21 expression in blood and urine were measured at different time points. Results A total of 449 cases (200 RIPC; 249 controls) were enrolled. The male/female ratio was 1.18, with a mean age of 37.50 ± 25.31 months. The incidence of AKI in the RIPC group was significantly lower than that in the control group (19.0% vs. 46.2%, P
ISSN:0931-041X
1432-198X
DOI:10.1007/s00467-017-3851-9