Scholarly Merits: From Measurement to Judgment

Scholarly Merits: From Measurement to Judgment

The discussion in Perspectives on Psychological Science about criteria for scholarly merit shows a potential bias of quantitative measurements compared with informed judgments of scholarly merits. This comment argues for a selection procedure that is open for qualitative arguments.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Perspectives on psychological science 2017-11, Vol.12 (6), p.1145-1147
1. Verfasser: Funke, Joachim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Bias
Court decisions
Employment
Faculty
Group Processes
Humans
Judgment
Measurement
Problem Solving
Research Personnel
Special Section on Scholarly Merit in Psychological Science, Part 2
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The discussion in Perspectives on Psychological Science about criteria for scholarly merit shows a potential bias of quantitative measurements compared with informed judgments of scholarly merits. This comment argues for a selection procedure that is open for qualitative arguments.
ISSN:1745-6916
1745-6924
DOI:10.1177/1745691617740129