Simulating the multi-seasonal response of a large-scale watershed with a 3D physically-based hydrologic model

The physically-based surface–subsurface HydroGeoSphere model is used to examine the hydrologic budget of the 286.6 km 2 Duffins Creek watershed, located 10 km northeast of metropolitan Toronto. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the utility of the model to simulate the three-dimen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2008-08, Vol.357 (3), p.317-336
Hauptverfasser: Li, Q., Unger, A.J.A., Sudicky, E.A., Kassenaar, D., Wexler, E.J., Shikaze, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 336
container_issue 3
container_start_page 317
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 357
creator Li, Q.
Unger, A.J.A.
Sudicky, E.A.
Kassenaar, D.
Wexler, E.J.
Shikaze, S.
description The physically-based surface–subsurface HydroGeoSphere model is used to examine the hydrologic budget of the 286.6 km 2 Duffins Creek watershed, located 10 km northeast of metropolitan Toronto. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the utility of the model to simulate the three-dimensional hydrologic response of the surface and subsurface flow systems in a large-scale watershed driven by multi-season precipitation events. The hydrologic model was calibrated to a consecutive sequence of hydrographs resulting from all precipitation events between the months of April and December 1986, while hydrographs from 1987 were used to test the model’s ability for prediction. Results demonstrate that a physically-based modeling approach which treats the surface and subsurface flow systems as an integrated continuum can capture the dynamic response of a large heterogeneous watershed as driven by transient precipitation events over a multi-season period. It was also revealed that full coupling of plant transpiration and surface–subsurface evaporation processes into the governing flow equations was critical for the successful calibration of the hydrographs. However, the ability of the model to predict the shape of individual hydrographs in the following year, during which the annual average precipitation rate decreased significantly, was diminished even though the annual average stream flows were closely replicated. We identify a number of data gaps that contribute to the decline in the predictive capacity of the model, including difficulty in establishing an appropriate initial condition, vertical mesh refinement issues within the root zone, and the reliance on a largely empirical relationship that distributes the net capacity for plant transpiration among various factors that may change from one year to the next.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19661797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169408002382</els_id><sourcerecordid>19661797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a417t-e81193305542f5cde87169555d24a345aec9479e455faf5904fb8e7f1cab2d9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM2O0zAUhSMEEmXgERDewC7Bv3G9QmiGP2kkFsOsrVvnunHlxMVOGfXtcZWKLd5Y1vmu79HXNG8Z7Rhl_cdDdxjPQ06x45RuO6o6yuWzZsO22rRcU_282VDKect6I182r0o50HqEkJtmegjTKcIS5j1ZRiT1sYS2IJQ0QyQZyzHNBUnyBEiEvMe2OIhInmDBXEYcyFNYxhqKO3IczyXUNJ7bHZQarbXSPjgypQHj6-aFh1jwzfW-aR6_fvl1-729__ntx-3n-xYk00uLW8aMEFQpyb1yA251ra6UGrgEIRWgM1IblEp58MpQ6Xdb1J452PHBeHHTfFj_Peb0-4RlsVMoDmOEGdOpWGb6nmmjK6hW0OVUSkZvjzlMkM-WUXuRaw_2Ktde5FqqbJVb595fF8BFh88wu1D-DXOqpDC0r9y7lfOQLOxzZR4fOGWCUsO06FklPq0EVh9_AmZbXMDZ4RAyusUOKfyny189vZ0s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19661797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simulating the multi-seasonal response of a large-scale watershed with a 3D physically-based hydrologic model</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Li, Q. ; Unger, A.J.A. ; Sudicky, E.A. ; Kassenaar, D. ; Wexler, E.J. ; Shikaze, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Q. ; Unger, A.J.A. ; Sudicky, E.A. ; Kassenaar, D. ; Wexler, E.J. ; Shikaze, S.</creatorcontrib><description>The physically-based surface–subsurface HydroGeoSphere model is used to examine the hydrologic budget of the 286.6 km 2 Duffins Creek watershed, located 10 km northeast of metropolitan Toronto. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the utility of the model to simulate the three-dimensional hydrologic response of the surface and subsurface flow systems in a large-scale watershed driven by multi-season precipitation events. The hydrologic model was calibrated to a consecutive sequence of hydrographs resulting from all precipitation events between the months of April and December 1986, while hydrographs from 1987 were used to test the model’s ability for prediction. Results demonstrate that a physically-based modeling approach which treats the surface and subsurface flow systems as an integrated continuum can capture the dynamic response of a large heterogeneous watershed as driven by transient precipitation events over a multi-season period. It was also revealed that full coupling of plant transpiration and surface–subsurface evaporation processes into the governing flow equations was critical for the successful calibration of the hydrographs. However, the ability of the model to predict the shape of individual hydrographs in the following year, during which the annual average precipitation rate decreased significantly, was diminished even though the annual average stream flows were closely replicated. We identify a number of data gaps that contribute to the decline in the predictive capacity of the model, including difficulty in establishing an appropriate initial condition, vertical mesh refinement issues within the root zone, and the reliance on a largely empirical relationship that distributes the net capacity for plant transpiration among various factors that may change from one year to the next.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.024</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; evaporation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Groundwater ; Hydrogeology ; HydroGeoSphere model ; Hydrologic model ; hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; mathematical models ; precipitation ; stream flow ; subsurface flow ; Surface water ; transpiration ; Watershed ; watershed hydrology ; watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2008-08, Vol.357 (3), p.317-336</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a417t-e81193305542f5cde87169555d24a345aec9479e455faf5904fb8e7f1cab2d9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a417t-e81193305542f5cde87169555d24a345aec9479e455faf5904fb8e7f1cab2d9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20543906$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unger, A.J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudicky, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassenaar, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wexler, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shikaze, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Simulating the multi-seasonal response of a large-scale watershed with a 3D physically-based hydrologic model</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>The physically-based surface–subsurface HydroGeoSphere model is used to examine the hydrologic budget of the 286.6 km 2 Duffins Creek watershed, located 10 km northeast of metropolitan Toronto. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the utility of the model to simulate the three-dimensional hydrologic response of the surface and subsurface flow systems in a large-scale watershed driven by multi-season precipitation events. The hydrologic model was calibrated to a consecutive sequence of hydrographs resulting from all precipitation events between the months of April and December 1986, while hydrographs from 1987 were used to test the model’s ability for prediction. Results demonstrate that a physically-based modeling approach which treats the surface and subsurface flow systems as an integrated continuum can capture the dynamic response of a large heterogeneous watershed as driven by transient precipitation events over a multi-season period. It was also revealed that full coupling of plant transpiration and surface–subsurface evaporation processes into the governing flow equations was critical for the successful calibration of the hydrographs. However, the ability of the model to predict the shape of individual hydrographs in the following year, during which the annual average precipitation rate decreased significantly, was diminished even though the annual average stream flows were closely replicated. We identify a number of data gaps that contribute to the decline in the predictive capacity of the model, including difficulty in establishing an appropriate initial condition, vertical mesh refinement issues within the root zone, and the reliance on a largely empirical relationship that distributes the net capacity for plant transpiration among various factors that may change from one year to the next.</description><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>evaporation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>HydroGeoSphere model</subject><subject>Hydrologic model</subject><subject>hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>mathematical models</subject><subject>precipitation</subject><subject>stream flow</subject><subject>subsurface flow</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>transpiration</subject><subject>Watershed</subject><subject>watershed hydrology</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM2O0zAUhSMEEmXgERDewC7Bv3G9QmiGP2kkFsOsrVvnunHlxMVOGfXtcZWKLd5Y1vmu79HXNG8Z7Rhl_cdDdxjPQ06x45RuO6o6yuWzZsO22rRcU_282VDKect6I182r0o50HqEkJtmegjTKcIS5j1ZRiT1sYS2IJQ0QyQZyzHNBUnyBEiEvMe2OIhInmDBXEYcyFNYxhqKO3IczyXUNJ7bHZQarbXSPjgypQHj6-aFh1jwzfW-aR6_fvl1-729__ntx-3n-xYk00uLW8aMEFQpyb1yA251ra6UGrgEIRWgM1IblEp58MpQ6Xdb1J452PHBeHHTfFj_Peb0-4RlsVMoDmOEGdOpWGb6nmmjK6hW0OVUSkZvjzlMkM-WUXuRaw_2Ktde5FqqbJVb595fF8BFh88wu1D-DXOqpDC0r9y7lfOQLOxzZR4fOGWCUsO06FklPq0EVh9_AmZbXMDZ4RAyusUOKfyny189vZ0s</recordid><startdate>20080815</startdate><enddate>20080815</enddate><creator>Li, Q.</creator><creator>Unger, A.J.A.</creator><creator>Sudicky, E.A.</creator><creator>Kassenaar, D.</creator><creator>Wexler, E.J.</creator><creator>Shikaze, S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam; New York]: Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080815</creationdate><title>Simulating the multi-seasonal response of a large-scale watershed with a 3D physically-based hydrologic model</title><author>Li, Q. ; Unger, A.J.A. ; Sudicky, E.A. ; Kassenaar, D. ; Wexler, E.J. ; Shikaze, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a417t-e81193305542f5cde87169555d24a345aec9479e455faf5904fb8e7f1cab2d9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>evaporation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>HydroGeoSphere model</topic><topic>Hydrologic model</topic><topic>hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>mathematical models</topic><topic>precipitation</topic><topic>stream flow</topic><topic>subsurface flow</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>transpiration</topic><topic>Watershed</topic><topic>watershed hydrology</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unger, A.J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudicky, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassenaar, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wexler, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shikaze, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Q.</au><au>Unger, A.J.A.</au><au>Sudicky, E.A.</au><au>Kassenaar, D.</au><au>Wexler, E.J.</au><au>Shikaze, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simulating the multi-seasonal response of a large-scale watershed with a 3D physically-based hydrologic model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2008-08-15</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>357</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>336</epage><pages>317-336</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>The physically-based surface–subsurface HydroGeoSphere model is used to examine the hydrologic budget of the 286.6 km 2 Duffins Creek watershed, located 10 km northeast of metropolitan Toronto. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the utility of the model to simulate the three-dimensional hydrologic response of the surface and subsurface flow systems in a large-scale watershed driven by multi-season precipitation events. The hydrologic model was calibrated to a consecutive sequence of hydrographs resulting from all precipitation events between the months of April and December 1986, while hydrographs from 1987 were used to test the model’s ability for prediction. Results demonstrate that a physically-based modeling approach which treats the surface and subsurface flow systems as an integrated continuum can capture the dynamic response of a large heterogeneous watershed as driven by transient precipitation events over a multi-season period. It was also revealed that full coupling of plant transpiration and surface–subsurface evaporation processes into the governing flow equations was critical for the successful calibration of the hydrographs. However, the ability of the model to predict the shape of individual hydrographs in the following year, during which the annual average precipitation rate decreased significantly, was diminished even though the annual average stream flows were closely replicated. We identify a number of data gaps that contribute to the decline in the predictive capacity of the model, including difficulty in establishing an appropriate initial condition, vertical mesh refinement issues within the root zone, and the reliance on a largely empirical relationship that distributes the net capacity for plant transpiration among various factors that may change from one year to the next.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.024</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2008-08, Vol.357 (3), p.317-336
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19661797
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
evaporation
Exact sciences and technology
Groundwater
Hydrogeology
HydroGeoSphere model
Hydrologic model
hydrologic models
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
mathematical models
precipitation
stream flow
subsurface flow
Surface water
transpiration
Watershed
watershed hydrology
watersheds
title Simulating the multi-seasonal response of a large-scale watershed with a 3D physically-based hydrologic model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T01%3A56%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulating%20the%20multi-seasonal%20response%20of%20a%20large-scale%20watershed%20with%20a%203D%20physically-based%20hydrologic%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Li,%20Q.&rft.date=2008-08-15&rft.volume=357&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=336&rft.pages=317-336&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19661797%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19661797&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169408002382&rfr_iscdi=true